Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
Published on: April 19, 2024
A comparison of regional anesthesia techniques for pain management in patients undergoing liver surgery: a network
Ke Sun1, Tao He1, Huabo Zhou1
1Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Objective:
This research aimed to evaluate the pain-relieving effectiveness and practicality of various regional anesthesia approaches in individuals undergoing hepatic procedures.
Method:
A total of 10 randomized controlled trials involving 710 patients were included. We considered any article comprising head-to-head evaluations of at least two of the seven focal regional modalities: continuous subcutaneous/local anesthetic wound infusion (CLAI), continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic epidural analgesia (EA), single-shot erector spinae plane block (ESPB), intrathecal morphine (ITM), quadratus lumborum block (QLB), or continuous thoracic paravertebral block (CTPVB). The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores at rest and movement. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 h; duration of inpatient stay; incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV); and any adverse events.
Results:
For resting pain scores, pairwise meta-analysis of EA compared to CLAI demonstrated no significant difference at 24 h (SMD = -0.71; 95% CI -2.09, -0.67) and at 48 h postoperatively (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI -0.74, -0.48). However, during movement, EA compared to CLAI demonstrated a significant difference at 24 h (SMD = -1.71, 95% CI -2.26, -1.17) and 48 h (SMD = -0.99, 95% CI -1.46, -0.53) postoperatively. This study does not provide conclusions regarding morphine equivalents at 72 h, the incidence of PONV, or the duration of hospital stay due to the absence of pairwise meta-analysis among the included regional anesthesia techniques.
Conclusion:
Among the seven regional anesthesia techniques for liver surgery, EA demonstrates strong analgesic efficacy but requires assessment of coagulation risk, while CESPB and QLB showcase a good safety profile but lack sufficient long-term evidence. This study offers comparative insights to guide clinical decisions rather than definite evidence of overall reliability or low risk associated with regional anesthesia.
More Related Videos
03:33Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Published on: September 27, 2024
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia