Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Murine Model of Femoral Artery Wire Injury with Implantation of a Perivascular Drug Delivery Patch
Published on: February 10, 2015
Wire-assisted modification of Havst catheter stripping of the great saphenous vein trunk
Xiaowen Lin1, Pengfei Li1, Lijuan Zhuang2
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated People's Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Insights
Wire-assisted great saphenous vein (GSV) stripping offers superior outcomes compared to conventional methods. This modified technique resulted in longer GSV stripping lengths and higher success rates with reduced incision size.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
- Phlebology
Background:
- Great saphenous vein (GSV) stripping is a common procedure for treating venous insufficiency.
- Conventional Havst catheter stripping has limitations in terms of efficacy and invasiveness.
- Advancements in surgical techniques aim to improve patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the therapeutic outcomes of conventional Havst catheter stripping versus a wire-assisted modification for GSV trunk stripping above the knee.
- To evaluate differences in stripping length, success rate, incision size, operative time, and pain scores between the two techniques.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 120 patients undergoing GSV trunk stripping.
- Patients were divided into two groups: conventional Havst catheter stripping (60 patients) and wire-assisted Havst catheter stripping (60 patients).
- Key outcomes including stripping length, surgical success, incision length, operative time, and intraoperative pain (VAS score) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The wire-assisted technique demonstrated significantly longer GSV stripping lengths (384 cm vs. 321 cm) and higher success rates (96.67% vs. 76.67%).
- A significantly shorter thigh incision length was observed with the wire-assisted method (11 cm vs. 12 cm).
- No significant differences were found in patient age, gender, clinical class, stripping time, or intraoperative pain scores.
Conclusions:
- Wire-assisted modification of Havst catheter stripping is more effective than the conventional approach.
- This technique allows for stripping of a longer GSV segment with improved success rates and reduced invasiveness.
- The modified technique offers a promising alternative for GSV treatment.
Objective:
To evaluate the therapeutic outcomes using Havst catheter stripping vs. a wire-assisted modification of Havst catheter stripping the trunk of great saphenous vein (GSV) above knee.
Methods:
Data were collected from 120 patients who underwent stripping of the GSV trunk using a Havst catheter from January 2025 to June 2025; 60 patients underwent the conventional approach to Havst catheter stripping and 60 patients underwent a wire-assisted modification of Havst catheter stripping. Age, gender, Clinical class, Stripping time of the GSV trunk (including tumescent anesthesia), length of the stripped GSV trunk above knee, intraoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, and success of surgery were compared between treatment groups.
Results:
A wire-assisted modification of Havst catheter stripping showed significant advantages over conventional approach of Havst catheter in terms of longer median (interquartile range, IQR) Stripping length of GSV trunk 384 (361, 407) vs. 321 (309, 334) cm, p < 0.0001, and higher success rate (96.67% vs. 76.67%, p = 0.0031), and shorter median (interquartile range, IQR) thigh incision length 11 (10, 12) vs. 12 (11, 14) cm, p = 0.0006). There were no significant differences in age (t-tests, mean ± standard deviation) (55.23 ± 10.00 vs. 54.60 ± 11.12 years, p = 0.7435), gender (p = 0.0956), Clinical class (p = 0.4395), Stripping time (t-tests, mean ± standard deviation) (410 ± 18 vs. 407 ± 17 s, p = 0.3816), intraoperative VAS pain score median (interquartile range, IQR) [(1 (1, 2) vs. 1 (1, 2), p = 0.8897].
Conclusion:
The wire-assisted modification of Havst catheter stripping enabled faster and the longer segment of the GSV trunk above knee was stripped compared to the conventional approach to Havst catheter stripping.
More Related Videos
07:30Creating Radio-cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula in the Forearm with a Modified No-Touch Technique
Published on: April 1, 2022
09:04Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Hemodialysis I: Introduction