Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026
A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training
Published on: January 20, 2019
Visual feedback adaptation enhances arm-posture coordination during floor-surface perturbations
Yosuke Tomita1, Hiroki Mani2, Naoya Hasegawa3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Care, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Gunma, Japan.
Background:
Maintaining postural stability during perturbations requires coordinated sensorimotor and interjoint coordination. This study investigated the effects of different feedback modalities (knowledge of results [KR] and continuous visual feedback) on postural adaptation during floor surface perturbations while standing.
Methods:
Nineteen healthy young adults (mean age: 23.1 ± 1.2 years; 12 males) performed an arm-holding task while standing on a backward-translating force platform under five phases: baseline test, KR adaptation training, post-KR adaptation (P-KRA) test, visual adaptation training, and post-visual adaptation (P-VA) test. Endpoint position variability, center of pressure (COP), center of mass (COM), margin of stability (MOS), and interjoint coordination were compared among Baseline, P-KRA, and P-VA using a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance.
Results:
Compared to Baseline, endpoint position variability was significantly reduced in the P-VA at both perturbation offset (8.97 ± 1.04 mm vs. 15.35 ± 1.52 mm, p = 0.006) and 1.5 s after offset (14.39 ± 1.02 mm vs. 19.73 ± 1.71 mm, p = 0.027). The MOS at 1.5 s after offset was lower in P-VA (39.33 ± 4.28 mm) than in Baseline (58.04 ± 4.53 mm, p = 0.011), and the minimum MOS was significantly smaller in P-VA (32.20 ± 4.38 mm vs. 50.59 ± 4.26 mm, p = 0.011). Anticipatory COP displacement at onset in P-VA was significantly increased (14.11 ± 1.46 mm vs. 6.20 ± 0.89 mm, p < 0.001) and reduced peak forward COP displacement (89.42 ± 2.00 mm vs. 110.18 ± 3.35 mm, p < 0.001). The time to stability was shorter in P-VA (1,266.42 ± 68.29 ms) than in Baseline (1,525.78 ± 66.11 ms, p = 0.017). The cross-correlation coefficient between the elbow and ankle joints was significantly higher in P-VA than in Baseline (0.98 ± 0.01 vs. 0.89 ± 0.04, p = 0.014).
Conclusion:
These findings demonstrate that continuous visual feedback adaptation may enhance arm-posture coordination during external perturbations in healthy young adults.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Effects of feedback
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
01:26Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...