Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Esophageal Heat Transfer for Patient Temperature Control and Targeted Temperature Management
Published on: November 21, 2017
Cost-benefit analysis of interventions to protect care home residents in England against heat risks
Andrew Ibbetson1, John Cairns2, Eleni Oikonomou1
1Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
We examine the cost-benefit of selected physical and behavioural interventions to reduce indoor temperatures and associated health risks in UK care homes during periods of hot weather typical of the projected future climate. Cases of heat-related mortality under selected temperature scenarios were modelled for three care home settings. Published temperature-mortality functions for care home residents of England and Wales were applied to life tables for care home populations. Building physics modelling was used to assess the effect of interventions on summer indoor temperatures and associated mortality risks. The monetised value of quality-adjusted life years gained was assessed in relation to the capital, energy and maintenance costs of each intervention over its lifespan under a range of assumptions. Sensitivity analyses were used to characterise model uncertainty. Under the assumption that those who die of heat have the life expectancy of an average care home resident, we found evidence for cost-effective interventions. The cost-effectiveness of interventions varied across care homes, depending on each building's specific characteristics. In a large, highly insulated care home with low thermal mass, increased thermal mass combined with window and door opening rules was the most cost-effective intervention; in a small care home with limited insulation and high thermal mass, active cooling in lounges using portable air-conditioners was most cost-effective; and in a medium sized care home with moderate insulation and thermal mass, shading combined with window and door opening rules was most cost-effective. Our results show that several interventions have the potential to be cost-effective in reducing heat-related risks to residents across a range of care home types. They also demonstrate that behavioural interventions, such as window and door opening, may be equally effective as physical interventions at reducing exposure to heat-related risks, provided they are fully adhered to.
More Related Videos
05:43Author Spotlight: Improving Lesion Contiguity in Pulmonary Vein Isolation via Proactive Esophageal Cooling
Published on: April 19, 2024
04:54Using a Combination of Indirect Calorimetry, Infrared Thermography, and Blood Glucose Levels to Measure Brown Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis in Humans
Published on: June 2, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Decreased Body Temperature
Factors Affecting Body Temperature
Factors may include:
Quantifying Heat
Homeostatic Imbalances in Body Temperature
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Methods of reducing fever
Pharmacological Methods of Reducing Fever: