Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Longitudinal Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy to Treat Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia
Published on: May 27, 2022
Laparoscopy for non-palpable undescended testis: comparing outcomes in syndromic and non-syndromic children
Agnes Raaschou Byström1, Nilla Hallabro1,2, Carolin Ericsson Selin1
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Purpose:
Boys with genetic syndromes have an increased risk of undescended testes (UDT), but laparoscopic findings and outcomes after two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy (FS2) are rarely reported. This study aims to compare laparoscopic findings and results after FS2 between syndromic and non-syndromic boys.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study on boys with UDT who underwent laparoscopy between 2014 and 2024. Syndromic and non-syndromic patients were compared regarding age at surgery, bilaterality, type of UDT, and atrophy rate after FS2.
Results:
In total, 190 boys with 298 testicles underwent laparoscopy. Of these, 42% were found to be intra-abdominal, 23% were vanishing testes and in 22% of cases, a testicular nubbin was found. Bilateral (p < 0.001) and intra-abdominal UDT (p < 0.01) were significantly more common in children with syndromes, whereas testicular nubbin was less common (p < 0.01). The median age at laparoscopy was higher in the group with syndromes. Atrophy occurred in 20% of all testicles undergoing FS2, with no significant difference in outcome between groups (p > 0,05).
Conclusion:
Syndromic boys present with more severe UDT but achieve comparable outcomes after FS2. Early diagnosis and individualized management are essential to preserve testicular viability in this high-risk group.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

