Practical Trade-Offs in 3D Cancer Imaging
Lucie Dequiedt1, Ashley L Kiemen1,2,3,4
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract:
Three-dimensional (3D) imaging is increasingly shaping cancer research. This piece highlights key technical considerations when adopting 3D over traditional two-dimensional (2D) imaging methods, emphasizing its unique ability to capture complex and heterogeneous tumor architecture. We also discuss the importance of multiomics integration and how virtual staining workflows can address scalability issues. Finally, we propose hybrid strategies that balance 2D and 3D imaging for a well-rounded understanding of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, underscoring the complementary value of both modalities in advancing cancer research. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .
More Related Videos
10:25Author Spotlight: Integrating High-Resolution Intravital Imaging and MRI to Enhance Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning
Published on: April 12, 2024
07:16Three-Dimensional Imaging of Tumor-Bearing Tissue Using the Iterative Bleaching Extends Multiplexity Approach
Published on: April 25, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
