Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.4K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
Introduction to Learning01:18

Introduction to Learning

895
Learning is the process of acquiring knowledge or skills through practice or experience, leading to long-lasting behavioral changes. This acquisition occurs through interaction with the environment and requires practice or experience. For instance, mastering a skill such as surfing requires considerable practice and experience, highlighting the essential role of repeated interactions with the environment in learning.
In contrast to learned behaviors, unlearned behaviors such as crying, sexual...
895
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

1.2K
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
1.2K
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

1.3K
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
1.3K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

970
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
970

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inter-Observer Variability of Gerd-Related Metrics on High-Resolution Manometry and Calculation of the Milan Score.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2026
Same author

Acthar Gel treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or dermatomyositis/polymyositis: analysis of physician-reported charts.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same author

Design of an integrated evidence-driven few-shot meta-learning for zero-day malware detection and forensic attributions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

American Foregut Society Education Committee: Development Of The Advanced Foregut Fellowship Program for Gastroenterology Trainees.

Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)·2026
Same author

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy standards for fellowship training in peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2026
Same author

Proton Pump Inhibitors Are More Cost-Effective Than Potassium Competitive Acid Blockers for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Sample Drift Correction Following 4D Confocal Time-lapse Imaging
10:04

Sample Drift Correction Following 4D Confocal Time-lapse Imaging

Published on: April 13, 2014

FL-MalDrift: a federated learning framework for malware detection under local concept drift.

Amit Patel1, Deepak Singh Tomar2, R K Pateriya2

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, M.P., 462003, India. amit.manit007@gmail.com.

Scientific Reports
|December 15, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces FL-MalDrift, a framework that enhances federated learning (FL) for Android malware detection by addressing concept drift. It improves accuracy and maintains privacy in evolving, non-stationary environments.

Keywords:
Client-side adaptationConcept driftDrift detection methodsFederated learningMalware detection

More Related Videos

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

Fully Automated Leg Tracking in Freely Moving Insects using Feature Learning Leg Segmentation and Tracking (FLLIT)
08:04

Fully Automated Leg Tracking in Freely Moving Insects using Feature Learning Leg Segmentation and Tracking (FLLIT)

Published on: April 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Sample Drift Correction Following 4D Confocal Time-lapse Imaging
10:04

Sample Drift Correction Following 4D Confocal Time-lapse Imaging

Published on: April 13, 2014

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

Fully Automated Leg Tracking in Freely Moving Insects using Feature Learning Leg Segmentation and Tracking (FLLIT)
08:04

Fully Automated Leg Tracking in Freely Moving Insects using Feature Learning Leg Segmentation and Tracking (FLLIT)

Published on: April 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cybersecurity
  • Machine Learning
  • Mobile Security

Background:

  • Continuous evolution of Android malware causes concept drift, degrading detector accuracy.
  • Federated learning (FL) faces challenges with non-IID and shifting client data, destabilizing aggregation and impacting privacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose FL-MalDrift, a novel federated framework resilient to concept drift for Android malware detection.
  • To enhance the accuracy and stability of FL-based malware detectors in dynamic environments.

Main Methods:

  • Integration of lightweight on-device drift detection algorithms (ADWIN, DDM, EDDM, HDDM) with adaptive participation control.
  • Server-side regulation using EWMA-smoothed drift scores to selectively aggregate stable client updates (FedAvg, FedSGD).
  • Client-side drift mitigation before update contribution.

Main Results:

  • Achieved high accuracy: 94.7% on Drebin, 96.8% on CICMalDroid 2020, and 92.4% on AndroZoo.
  • Demonstrated framework stability under client heterogeneity and concept drift.
  • Maintained privacy preservation while filtering drift-affected updates.

Conclusions:

  • FL-MalDrift offers a scalable, privacy-preserving solution for robust Android malware detection in non-stationary environments.
  • Coupling client-side drift detection with dynamic participation control effectively stabilizes FL training.
  • Future work includes differential privacy, compression-aware aggregation, and large-scale validation.