Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Tuning Oxide Properties by Oxygen Vacancy Control During Growth and Annealing
Published on: June 9, 2023
An unconventional pathway to correlate the octahedral tilt coupling and spin-orbit reconstruction at oxide interfaces
Jayjit Kumar Dey1,2, Koushik Jagadish1, Arka Bandyopadhyay3
1Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.
None:
The direct experimental probing and detailed imaging of octahedral tilt, along with the control of magnetic ground state and spin-orbit occupancies in an artificially engineered heterointerface through the strain manipulation via interface engineering, is the long-standing challenging issue addressed here. We introduce an innovative methodology to measure the projected O-O-O angles (O-O-Oproj) between the neighboring in-plane BO6 octahedra of perovskite oxide (ABO3), demonstrating a precise quantification of strain-manipulated octahedral tilt in atomically engineered LaCoO3 (LCO)/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) bilayer interfaces. The pronounced octahedral tilt on SrTiO3 (STO) substrate (tensile strain) compared to LaAlO3 (LAO) substrate (compressive strain) correlates to the magnetism especially within the framework of bond angle geometry and spin-charge-orbital reconstructions, contrasting with individual single-phase films. Interfacial orbital reconstruction, Co/Mn antiferromagnetic coupling and their strain manipulation are quantified through X-ray linear dichroism (XLD) and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) measurements, further confirmed by both molecular orbital theory and Goodenough-Kanamori-Anderson rules. First principles calculations unveil a higher (lower) magnetic moment of individual magnetic atoms with tensile (compressive) strain, including unusual interfacial antiferromagnetism arising d-orbital occupations, and bond angle geometry. This endeavor paves a potential method to manipulate the octahedral tilt to tailor emergent phenomena at heterointerfaces via atomically precise strain-interface engineering.
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II

