Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
Published on: April 18, 2025
Mapping the Quality and Standardization of Methodological Reports in POCUS Research: A Scoping Review Protocol
Rosana Aparecida Pereira1, Larissa Gleyciani Verdeli2, Joao Henrique Ribeiro Machado Silva1
1Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing. Avenida Bandeirantes, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background:
Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has become an essential tool for diagnosis and monitoring across diverse clinical settings, enabling rapid and safe decision-making. Despite its widespread use, considerable heterogeneity persists in how studies report methodological aspects such as protocol descriptions, operator qualifications, and equipment characteristics. This lack of standardization limits comparability between studies, compromises reproducibility, and hinders the integration of POCUS into clinical guidelines and training curricula.
Objective:
To map and critically analyze the methodological aspects of studies using POCUS, with a focus on standardization, quality, and reproducibility of reported procedures.
Methods:
This scoping review will follow the JBI guidelines and be reported according to the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, LILACS, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, without restrictions on language or publication period. We will include original studies applying POCUS in humans, regardless of clinical context. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full texts, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Data will be extracted using a standardized form adapted from JBI, capturing information on study design, population characteristics, ultrasound protocols, operator qualifications, and reported outcomes. Results will be synthesized descriptively and organized according to the I-AIM framework (Indication, Acquisition, Interpretation, and Medical Decision-Making), supplemented with tables, conceptual diagrams, and visual representations.
Discussion:
Given the variability in POCUS literature, this scoping review will identify patterns, inconsistencies, and gaps in methodological reporting. Although international frameworks, such as I-AIM provide guidance, adherence remains inconsistent, underscoring the need for more uniform standards. Findings from this review are expected to inform reporting practices, enhance methodological quality, and support the safe and effective incorporation of POCUS into clinical practice.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
06:26Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
Published on: November 27, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Data Reporting and Recording
Introduction to Documentation and Reporting
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive...
Levels of Use of a GIS