Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
Published on: July 26, 2019
Underlying mechanisms of visual mismatch responses - An EEG-fMRI study
Insa Schlossmacher1,2, Ina Protmann1, Jacky Dilly1
1Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Neural responses to unexpected visual events are stronger due to prediction errors and adaptation. This study reveals these mechanisms vary in time and brain regions, impacting visual deviance processing.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Visual Perception
Background:
- Unexpected visual stimuli elicit stronger neural responses than expected ones.
- Key mechanisms include prediction errors and adaptation to frequent stimuli.
- Systematic variations of these mechanisms across time and cortical areas remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how prediction errors and adaptation contribute to neural responses to visual deviance.
- To determine if these mechanisms vary across different time points and cortical regions.
- To elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual deviance processing.
Main Methods:
- Simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were employed.
- An oddball task with tailored control conditions was used to differentiate mechanisms.
- Analysis focused on early/late EEG responses (visual mismatch negativity, P3) and fMRI activations (occipital cortex, superior parietal lobe).
Main Results:
- EEG data revealed visual mismatch negativity and an enhanced P3 component.
- fMRI showed increased activation in the occipital cortex (OC) and superior parietal lobe (SPL).
- Adaptation primarily explained early EEG/posterior OC responses, while prediction error explained later responses in anterior OC and SPL.
Conclusions:
- Deviance processing involves both adaptation and prediction error mechanisms.
- The relative contribution of these mechanisms is not uniform but varies systematically in time and space.
- Findings suggest a spatiotemporal gradient in how the brain processes unexpected visual information.
More Related Videos
10:33Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2012
11:28Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging
Published on: June 30, 2018