Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

11:34
Single-cell RNA Sequencing and Analysis of Human Pancreatic Islets
Published on: July 18, 2019
17.0K
Bulk RNA-seq deconvolution heterogeneity across paired pancreatic cancer human samples
Rick J Jansen1, Sarah A Munro2, Samuel O Antwi3
1Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Frontiers in Genetics
|December 16, 2025
Summary
Comparing gene expression in two tumor samples from the same patient revealed variations in cell type proportions, particularly for NK cells and macrophages. This suggests multiple biopsies may be needed for accurate cancer treatment planning.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Genomic data holds promise for personalized cancer treatment.
- Intratumor genetic heterogeneity necessitates understanding variations within a tumor.
- Assessing gene expression differences between tumor samples is crucial for treatment planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if tumor gene expression analysis interpretation varies between two specimens from the same patient.
- To compare cell type proportions and gene expression reliability across paired tumor samples.
- To evaluate the concordance of key gene expression in pancreatic cancer.
Main Methods:
- Bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 16 patients.
- Three deconvolution methods were used to compare cell type proportions between paired samples.
- Transcripts per million (TPM) normalization and batch effect adjustment were applied for comparative analysis of gene expression.
Main Results:
- Significant variations in cell type proportions were observed for NK cells and macrophages between paired samples (adjusted p-value < 0.002).
- No significant differences in average expression were found for selected genes (KRAS, TP53, SMAD4, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, JUN, SMAD3, SMAD7, TCF7).
- Substantial concordance (kappa = 0.75) was observed for JUN, with low to moderate concordance for other genes.
Conclusions:
- Findings suggest that multiple tumor samples may be required for effective cancer treatment planning due to observed variations.
- Differences in expression values could be attributed to varying cell type proportions between samples.
- Further studies with larger sample sizes and consistent sequencing technologies are needed to confirm these interpretations.

