Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Acetylcholine Re-Challenge After Intracoronary Nitroglycerine Administration
Published on: April 4, 2022
Colchicine Among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Mohamed Hamed1, Sheref A Mohamed2, Mohamed Abdelazeem3
1Division of Cardiology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Introduction:
Prior trials evaluating the benefit of colchicine in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have yielded mixed results. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the role of colchicine after ACS.
Methods:
We performed an electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases through November 2024 for studies comparing colchicine with placebo after ACS. Our study's primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Results:
Our final analysis included five RCTs with 12,979 patients with a mean follow-up of 26.6 months. The weighted mean age was 59.8 years. Colchicine was associated with a modest reduction of MACE with marginal significance and high heterogeneity (7.3% vs. 8.3%; relative risk [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.99; I2 = 68%) compared with placebo. This benefit was inconsistent after excluding the study with higher heterogeneity. There was no significant difference between colchicine and placebo in all-cause mortality (3.4% vs. 3.5%; RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.71-1.53; I2 = 43%), cardiac mortality (2.2% vs. 2.2%; RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.81-1.29; I2 = 0), myocardial infarction (MI) (3.1% vs. 3.6%; RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.61-1.11; I2 = 35%), ischemia-driven repeat revascularization (4.3% vs. 4.6%; RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.37-1.50; I2 = 54%), and stroke (0.9% vs. 1.1%; RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.18-1.44; I2 = 68%). Colchicine had a higher risk of gastrointestinal (GI) side effects (11.7% vs. 8.6%; RR 1.36; 95% CI 1.07-1.71; I2 = 67%) compared with placebo.
Conclusions:
Among patients with ACS, colchicine may modestly reduce the incidence of MACE compared with placebo, but this effect is not robust after excluding the study with a higher risk of bias. In addition, no significant benefits were observed for the main individual outcomes of MACE, including all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, ischemia-driven repeat revascularization and stroke. Yet, colchicine was associated with a higher risk of GI side effects.
More Related Videos
06:39Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care