Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Research methodologies for creating competency frameworks for the public health workforce: a scoping review
Mohammed A Kilani1,2,3, Pablo Rodriguez-Feria1,3,4, Milena Pavlova3,5
1Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, FHML, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Public health workforce competency frameworks show diverse development methods but have significant reporting gaps. Standardization and transparency are crucial for strengthening global public health capabilities.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Workforce Development
- Competency Frameworks
Background:
- Competency frameworks are essential for defining Public Health Workforce (PHW) capabilities, education, and standards.
- Existing frameworks for the PHW exhibit considerable variation in their methodologies for defining competencies and domains.
- This scoping review examines the methodologies used in developing multi-professional PHW frameworks published between 2018 and 2024.
Purpose of the Study:
- To map and analyze the methodologies employed in the development of multi-professional Public Health Workforce competency frameworks.
- To identify common practices, patterns, and reporting gaps in the creation of these frameworks.
- To provide insights for improving the consistency and rigor of future framework development.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and PRISMA-ScR checklist.
- Searched key databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health, WorldCat) for frameworks published between 2018-2024.
- Utilized dual screening and extraction to capture framework characteristics and sequential development methods, followed by descriptive analysis.
Main Results:
- 58 multi-professional PHW frameworks were included, primarily from North America and Europe.
- Commonly reported methods included literature reviews (45.4%), surveys (29.5%), and expert consultations (22.7%).
- Most frameworks (82.6%) used multi-step processes, but 24.1% had significant reporting gaps, indicating variable quality.
Conclusions:
- The development of Public Health Workforce competency frameworks is characterized by diverse, multi-step processes but is hampered by reporting inconsistencies.
- Standardization and enhanced transparency in reporting are vital for improving the quality and comparability of frameworks.
- Adopting multi-method approaches that integrate evidence synthesis, stakeholder engagement, and validation is recommended to strengthen the global PHW.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
