Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Efficient Methodology to Confidently Differentiate and Characterize Fentanyl Analogs
Published on: November 8, 2024
Impact of the enhanced Fatality Analysis Reporting System on drug detection in fatally injured drivers
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 10032 New York, NY, USA.
Abstract:
The prevalence of drugged driving has been increasing in the United States. In 2018, the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) enhanced toxicology data collection by expanding the number of reportable nonalcohol drugs beyond the previous limit of three. In this repeated cross-sectional study, we used difference-in-differences analyses, Poisson regression, and joinpoint regression to assess changes in the detection of alcohol and nonalcohol drugs among fatally injured drivers before (2013-2017; n = 68,741) and after (2018-2022; n = 69,764) the enhancement. The prevalence of alcohol remained stable over time, averaging 37 %, with similar values in 2013-2017 (37.1 %) and 2018-2022 (37.9 %). In contrast, the prevalence of any nonalcohol drug increased from 39.9 % to 55.0 % (p < 0.001). The prevalence of marijuana rose from 14.4 % to 26.4 % (p < 0.001), stimulants from 9.3 % to 25.1 % (p < 0.001), and depressants from 9.1 % to 13.7 % (p < 0.001). Between the two periods, the prevalence of ≥ 1 nonalcohol drug increased by 9 %, with marijuana and stimulants showing the largest gains. Drivers who tested positive for both alcohol and marijuana increased from 8.3 % to 11.8 % (p < 0.001). The proportion that tested positive for ≥ 2 nonalcohol drugs rose from 13.6 % to 19.2 % (p < 0.001), and for ≥ 3 drugs from 2.0 % to 5.8 % (p < 0.001). The mean number of nonalcohol drugs detected increased from 1.36 to 1.50 (p < 0.001). In adjusted models, the odds of detecting any nonalcohol drug associated with the enhanced toxicology data collection increased 42 % [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.42, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.37, 1.47], with greater increase in detecting ≥ 2 drugs (aOR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.40, 1.52) and ≥ 3 drugs (aOR 3.01, 95 % CI 2.80, 3.24). These findings highlight improved detection of polysubstance use among fatally injured drivers following the adoption of a comprehensive toxicological testing data file by FARS in 2018.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods

