Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Tumor Progression02:07

Tumor Progression

7.2K
Tumor progression is a phenomenon where the pre-formed tumor acquires successive mutations to become clinically more aggressive and malignant. In the 1950s, Foulds first described the stepwise progression of cancer cells through successive stages.
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bridging access, training, and robotic surgery technology: lessons from the 2025 SRS LATAM session.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Does Aquablation Therapy Improve Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years With Benign Prostatic Obstruction?

Lower urinary tract symptoms·2026
Same author

Reply to Alexander Light, Max Peters, Manit Arya, et al's Salvage Focal Therapy vs Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2026;12:364-73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.6448.

European urology·2026
Same author

The need for a dedicated surgical consent framework for robotic telesurgery: a global call to action.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Adverse pathology and low tumor volume in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: Toward safe expansion of active surveillance and focal therapy.

Urologic oncology·2026
Same author

Aquablation for dual burden disease - BPH and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a single-center prospective pilot study.

BMC urology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

1.1K

Cell Cycle Progression Score Identifies Biopsy-Undetected Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer.

Yu Ozawa1, Marcio Covas Moschovas1,2, Marco Sandri3

  • 1AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, Florida, USA.

The Prostate
|December 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Cell Cycle Progression (CCP) score improves prostate cancer risk stratification by identifying high-risk Grade Group 5 (GG5) disease often missed by biopsy. Combining CCP with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score enhances detection of aggressive prostate cancer.

Keywords:
Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment scoreGleason score 9–10biopsy undergradingclinical cell‐cycle risk scoregenomic classifierrisk stratification

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

1.1K
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

1.1K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

1.1K
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Urology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Grade Group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer has the worst prognosis but is frequently missed during initial biopsy.
  • Accurate identification of GG5 disease is crucial for appropriate patient management and treatment planning.
  • Current risk stratification tools may not sufficiently identify patients with biopsy-undetected GG5 disease.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if the Cell Cycle Progression (CCP) score can identify biopsy-undetected GG5 prostate cancer.
  • To determine if combining CCP score with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score improves risk stratification.
  • To assess the predictive performance of CCP score and its combination with CAPRA compared to existing risk models.

Main Methods:

  • 430 patients with biopsy-confirmed Grade Group 1-4 prostate cancer underwent Prolaris® testing (CCP score) before radical prostatectomy (RP).
  • Logistic regression was used to assess the association between CCP score and pathological GG5 at RP.
  • Predictive models (CCP, CAPRA, clinical cell-cycle risk [CCR] score) were compared using Area Under the Curve (AUC), Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI).

Main Results:

  • CCP score independently predicted pathological GG5 disease (p < 0.001), even after adjusting for CAPRA score and biopsy core number.
  • The combination of CCP and CAPRA scores (AUC=0.77) and the CCR score (AUC=0.74) demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to CAPRA alone (AUC=0.67).
  • CCP score significantly improved risk classification, especially when combined with CAPRA, identifying a subset of patients with a substantially higher risk of GG5 disease (78% vs. 5.7%).

Conclusions:

  • The CCP score adds significant value to initial prostate cancer risk assessment, particularly for patients categorized as low- to favorable-intermediate-risk by CAPRA.
  • An elevated CCP score should prompt discussion regarding the increased risk of undetected GG5 disease and consideration of intensified management strategies.
  • These findings are particularly relevant in non-surgical settings where definitive pathological information is unavailable, aiding in treatment decisions.