Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Pan-Immune-Inflammatory Value Predicts the Risk of Myocardial Infarction Among Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris
Ce Chen1, Bo Zhao1, Yongyan Fan1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Objective:
This study investigates the potential of the pan-immune-inflammatory value (PIV) as a predictive indicator for myocardial infarction (MI) risk in unstable angina pectoris (UAP) patients and its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
UAP patients diagnosed with MI underwent PCI and were monitored for MACE, including mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization, cerebrovascular accidents, and heart failure admissions. Clinical profiles and PIV levels were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to identify variables associated with MI and MACE risk.
Results:
MI patients had higher PIV (409.07 ± 127.63 vs 284.44 ± 126.96 × 101 8/L2, P < 0.001) and LDL-C (2.91 ± 1.04 vs 2.31 ± 1.06 mmol/L, P < 0.001) levels. Both PIV (OR = 1.008, P < 0.001) and LDL-C (OR = 1.694, P < 0.001) were significant predictors of MI. ROC analysis showed that PIV had stronger discriminatory capacity (AUC = 0.755) than LDL-C (AUC = 0.661), with their combined model improving predictive performance (AUC = 0.787). In PCI-treated MI patients, those developing MACE had higher PIV (452.66 ± 105.24 vs 378.45 ± 133.53 × 101 8/L2, P = 0.001) and TC levels (4.84 ± 0.39 vs 4.66 ± 0.42 mmol/L, P = 0.010). Both TC (OR = 3.337, P = 0.007) and PIV (OR = 1.005, P = 0.001) were independently associated with MACE. The combined model (AUC = 0.721) outperformed individual markers.
Conclusion:
PIV is independently associated with MI risk in UAP patients and MACE following PCI. Combining PIV with lipid markers may enhance clinical risk assessment and inform management strategies.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Angina II: Classification
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests