Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Exploring the relationship of diagnostic reasoning, self-efficacy, and clinical reasoning of physical therapy
Shala Cunningham1, Matthew Kessinger2, Alejandra Mott3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Radford University, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Purpose:
One of the primary objectives of entry-level physical therapy education is to develop students' clinical reasoning (CR) skills to provide optimal, patient-centered care. However, CR is a highly contextualized concept, and the assessment of CR development to ensure students have the requisite skills for safe patient care prior to clinical experiences is challenging within an education program. Self-assessment tools may provide a time-efficient opportunity to assess students' CR development across their education. Both diagnostic reasoning and self-efficacy have been correlated with CR performance in physical therapy. This study aimed to explore the relationship between diagnostic reasoning, self-efficacy, and CR development among physical therapy students.
Methods:
Diagnostic reasoning was assessed through the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory (DTI). Self-efficacy was measured by the New General Self-Efficacy (NGSE) scale and Physical Therapist Self-Efficacy (PTSE) scale. CR ability was evaluated through the Think Aloud Standardized Patient Examination (TASPE) performed during a standardized patient simulation, and scores for the CR performance criteria as assessed by clinical instructors on the Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument Version 2006 (CPI).
Results:
There was no correlation between self-assessment scores on the DTI, NGSE, PTSE, and CR performance assessed by faculty during a standardized patient simulation (TASPE) or clinical instructors using the midterm and final CPI during a 12-week full-time clinical experience.
Conclusion:
This study was unable to identify a self-assessment tool or a student performance indicator that could accurately predict CR performance during upcoming full-time clinical experiences.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
04:22Treatment Model for Young Patients with Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction and Resultant Infertility
Published on: May 30, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Critical Thinking II
Patient-centered Care
Critical Thinking I
Self-Efficacy
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory