Long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement in patients with systemic autoimmune disease: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Yu-Wei Chan1, Jing-Ren Ye2, Ling-Yi Wei3
1National Taiwan University School of Medicine.
Background:
Late outcomes among patients with systemic autoimmune disease (SAD) who underwent heart valve replacement are not well established. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes after an initial, isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR) with either a bioprosthesis or a mechanical prosthesis in patients with SAD.
Materials And Methods:
In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, we retrieved longitudinal data from the National Health Insurance Research Database for patients with SAD undergoing primary MVR from 1 January 2001, to 31 December 2018.
Results:
A total of 34,563 patients undergoing heart valve replacement for the first time between January 2001 and December 2018 were identified. After applying exclusion criteria and propensity-score matching, we included 273 bioprosthesis recipients and 273 mechanical prosthesis recipients, and the median duration of follow-up was 5.98 years and 7.44 years, respectively. There was no significant difference between the bioprosthesis group and the mechanical prosthesis group in the incidences of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97 to 1.64) and the composite outcome of major adverse prosthesis-related events (MAPE) (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.10). The risk of ischemic stroke was lower in the bioprosthesis group (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.87). Subgroup analyses showed that bioprostheses were associated with a lower risk of MAPEs (10-year restricted mean survival time [RMST] difference: 1.25 years, 95% CI: 0.28 to 2.21) and major bleeding (10-year RMST difference: 1.11 years, 95% CI: 0.03 to 2.19) in male patients.
Conclusion:
Among patients with SAD undergoing MVR, there was no significant difference between bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of MAPEs. However, bioprostheses showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke. In male patients, bioprostheses were linked to fewer MAPEs and major bleeding.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

