Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
Published on: June 29, 2019
Comparison of Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists and Proton Pump Inhibitors for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Patients
Asad E Patanwala1,2, Brian L Erstad3
1Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Objectives:
To compare the effectiveness of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) vs. proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for stress ulcer prophylaxis on the occurrence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and other clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with septic shock.
Design:
Retrospective, multicenter, propensity-weighted cohort study.
Setting:
Conducted across 220 geographically diverse community and teaching hospitals in the United States.
Patients:
Adult patients (age ≥ 18 yr) with septic shock who were initiated on either H2RAs or PPIs on the day of hospital admission.
Interventions:
H2RAs (famotidine) or PPIs (pantoprazole, omeprazole, esomeprazole, or lansoprazole).
Measurements And Main Results:
The primary outcome was the occurrence of UGIB during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and hospital length of stay. Propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to control for confounding. Among 15,102 patients (5,492 H2RA, 9,610 PPI), the mean age was 65.8 ± 14.9 years, 47.8% were female, and 58.1% received invasive mechanical ventilation during hospitalization. After IPTW adjustment, PPI use was associated with a lower occurrence of UGIB compared with H2RA (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96; p = 0.016). A sensitivity analysis comparing famotidine to pantoprazole confirmed this finding (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97; p = 0.025). No significant differences were observed in in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.06; p = 0.691), ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-1.04; p = 0.188), C. difficile infection (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.82-2.13; p = 0.246), or hospital length of stay (incidence rate ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98-1.05; p = 0.417).
Conclusions:
In this large, diverse cohort of U.S. hospitalized adults with septic shock, PPI use for stress ulcer prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of UGIB compared with H2RA, with no significant differences in mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia, C. difficile infection, or hospital length of stay.
Related Concept Videos
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Histamine H2-Receptor Antagonists
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Proton Pump Inhibitors
Gastric acid, a potent cocktail of hydrogen and chloride ions, is produced in specialized parietal cells within the...
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Antacids
However, this neutralization reaction between...
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy

