Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gibbs Free Energy and Thermodynamic Favorability02:23

Gibbs Free Energy and Thermodynamic Favorability

8.0K
The spontaneity of a process depends upon the temperature of the system. Phase transitions, for example, will proceed spontaneously in one direction or the other depending upon the temperature of the substance in question. Likewise, some chemical reactions can also exhibit temperature-dependent spontaneities. To illustrate this concept, the equation relating free energy change to the enthalpy and entropy changes for the process is considered:
8.0K
Gibbs Free Energy02:39

Gibbs Free Energy

37.9K
One of the challenges of using the second law of thermodynamics to determine if a process is spontaneous is that it requires measurements of the entropy change for the system and the entropy change for the surroundings. An alternative approach involving a new thermodynamic property defined in terms of system properties only was introduced in the late nineteenth century by American mathematician Josiah Willard Gibbs. This new property is called the Gibbs free energy (G) (or simply the free...
37.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
An Introduction to Free Energy01:05

An Introduction to Free Energy

10.8K
How can we compare the energy that releases from one reaction to that of another reaction? We use a measurement of free energy to quantitate these energy transfers. Scientists call this free energy Gibbs free energy (abbreviated with the letter G) after Josiah Willard Gibbs, the scientist who developed the measurement. According to the second law of thermodynamics, all energy transfers involve losing some energy in an unusable form such as heat, resulting in entropy. Gibbs free energy...
10.8K
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States03:25

Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States

13.3K
The free energy change for a process taking place with reactants and products present under nonstandard conditions (pressures other than 1 bar; concentrations other than 1 M) is related to the standard free energy change according to this equation:
13.3K
Free Energy01:21

Free Energy

51.6K
Free energy—abbreviated as G for the scientist Gibbs who discovered it—is a measurement of useful energy that can be extracted from a reaction to do work. It is the energy in a chemical reaction that is available after entropy is accounted for. Reactions that take in energy are considered endergonic and reactions that release energy are exergonic. Plants carry out endergonic reactions by taking in sunlight and carbon dioxide to produce glucose and oxygen. Animals, in turn, break...
51.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human hippocampal ripples tune cortical responses based on predicted uncertainty.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Testing and tracking in the UK: A dynamic causal modelling study.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

The evolutionary and organizational bases of active affordance.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

The methodological foundations of lesion network mapping remain sound.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Protocol for investigating the warping of spatial experience across the blind spot to contrast predictions of the Integrated Information Theory and Predictive Processing accounts of consciousness.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Active Inference and Functional Parametrisation: Differential Flatness and Smooth Random Realisation.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Large-scale discovery and annotation of substructure patterns in mass spectrometry profiles.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Salmonella SopB suppresses post-transcriptionally regulated cytokine release to reduce early tissue inflammation and delay disease progression.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

A human-specific microRNA controls the timing of excitatory synaptogenesis.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

An HMA-like integrated domain in the wheat tandem kinase WTK4 recognises an RNase-like pathogen effector.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Learning regularities in noise engages both neural predictive activity and representational changes.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

The H3K4 methyltransferase KMT2D is an essential cofactor for GATA1 at erythroid gene enhancers.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Distributionally robust free energy principle for decision-making.

Allahkaram Shafiei1, Hozefa Jesawada2, Karl Friston3

  • 1Czech Technical University, Prague, Czechia.

Nature Communications
|December 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We introduce a new model, Distributionally Robust Free Energy (DR-FREE), to make autonomous agents more robust. This approach helps agents perform reliably even when conditions change unexpectedly, overcoming limitations of current AI models.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Robotics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Autonomous agents exhibit high performance but struggle with inconsistent training and environmental conditions.
  • This lack of robustness leads to undesirable behaviors and failures, hindering real-world deployment.
  • Addressing training-environment ambiguities is crucial for reliable intelligent agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel model, Distributionally Robust Free Energy (DR-FREE), designed to inherently instill robustness in autonomous agents.
  • To enhance decision-making mechanisms by integrating robustness by design.
  • To improve agent performance in ambiguous or changing environments.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the Distributionally Robust Free Energy (DR-FREE) model.
  • Combined a robust extension of the free energy principle with a resolution engine.
  • Integrated robustness directly into agent decision-making processes.

Main Results:

  • DR-FREE demonstrated superior robustness in autonomous agents across benchmark experiments.
  • Agents equipped with DR-FREE successfully completed tasks where state-of-the-art models failed due to environmental inconsistencies.
  • The model effectively handles training-environment ambiguities.

Conclusions:

  • DR-FREE provides a robust solution for autonomous agents facing environmental uncertainties.
  • This approach may enable wider deployment in multi-agent systems and complex environments.
  • The findings offer insights into how natural agents adapt to unpredictable conditions with minimal training.