Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deconvolution01:20

Deconvolution

524
Deconvolution, also known as inverse filtering, is the process of extracting the impulse response from known input and output signals. This technique is vital in scenarios where the system's characteristics are unknown, and they must be inferred from the observable signals.
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
524

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chronic intermittent hypoxia triggers hepatic platelet recruitment.

Sleep medicine·2026
Same author

Predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in acute myeloid leukemia from gene expression profiles by machine learning.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Deep Learning of Histopathology Predicts Outcomes After Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same author

Netrin1 blockade alleviates resistance to chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Nature·2026
Same author

Mucinous vs. non-mucinous pancreatic cysts: diagnostic keys on CT and MRI.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026
Same author

Risk prediction model for high-grade dysplasia in resected pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms: a nomogram-based approach.

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association·2026
Same journal

Integrated lipidomic and transcriptomic profiling of the host response in human malaria.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Centromeric satellite expansion drives genome evolution in the snowy owl.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Mapping the landscape of allele-specific expression in porcine genomes.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Genomic sequence evolution underlying human neocortical interareal diversification.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Regulatory mechanisms driven by functional 3'-UTR variants in alcohol use disorder and related traits.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

A longitudinal single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of bovine placentation reveals dynamic cellular hierarchies and regulatory programs.

Genome biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Workflow for High-content, Individual Cell Quantification of Fluorescent Markers from Universal Microscope Data, Supported by Open Source Software
09:57

Workflow for High-content, Individual Cell Quantification of Fluorescent Markers from Universal Microscope Data, Supported by Open Source Software

Published on: December 16, 2014

13.5K

A robust workflow to benchmark deconvolution of multi-omic data.

Elise Amblard1, Vadim Bertrand2, Hugo Barbot3

  • 1TIMC, UMR 5525, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble, France. elise.amblard@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.

Genome Biology
|December 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a framework to compare deconvolution algorithms for analyzing tumor heterogeneity from molecular data. It provides guidance on selecting the best methods for transcriptomic and methylomic analyses.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

3.9K
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Workflow for High-content, Individual Cell Quantification of Fluorescent Markers from Universal Microscope Data, Supported by Open Source Software
09:57

Workflow for High-content, Individual Cell Quantification of Fluorescent Markers from Universal Microscope Data, Supported by Open Source Software

Published on: December 16, 2014

13.5K
Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

3.9K
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Genomics
  • Cancer research

Background:

  • Tumor heterogeneity impacts cancer progression and treatment efficacy.
  • Quantifying tumor heterogeneity from bulk molecular data is challenging.
  • Deconvolution algorithms estimate cell type proportions but lack consensus for transcriptomic/methylomic data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an unbiased evaluation framework for deconvolution algorithms.
  • To comprehensively compare deconvolution methods across transcriptomic and methylomic data.
  • To provide practical guidance for selecting optimal algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a reproducible evaluation framework using containerization.
  • Compared reference-based and reference-free deconvolution algorithms.
  • Assessed algorithm performance, stability, and efficiency across diverse datasets and conditions.

Main Results:

  • Presented the first comprehensive comparison of deconvolution algorithms for both omics types.
  • Evaluated algorithm performance under various conditions, including gene dependencies and sample composition.
  • Utilized benchmark datasets and a novel multi-omics dataset for validation.

Conclusions:

  • Highlighted the strengths and limitations of different deconvolution algorithms.
  • Provided practical guidance for algorithm selection based on data type and context.
  • Established a new standard for evaluating deconvolution methods for tumor heterogeneity analysis.