Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

High-throughput Identification of Synergistic Drug Combinations by the Overlap2 Method
Published on: May 21, 2018
Beautiful weights, misinterpreted effects: the use and misuse of overlap weighting in major medical journals,
John G Rizk1, Giuseppe Lippi2, Carl J Lavie3
1Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Objectives:
To evaluate the implementation and reporting practices of overlap weighting in major medical journals.
Study Design And Setting:
We reviewed observational studies published from January 2020 to September 2025 in five major medical journals (Annals of Internal Medicine, The British Medical Journal [BMJ], Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], JAMA Internal Medicine, and The New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM]) that used overlap weighting as a primary or sensitivity adjustment method. Reporting quality was assessed for estimand specification, definition of the overlap population, justification of the method, acknowledgment of advantages, and discussion of interpretability.
Results:
Seventeen eligible studies were identified. Four studies (24%) correctly named the estimand as the average treatment effect in the overlap population; two (12%) misreported the estimand as average treatment effect, and the remainder did not specify an estimand. Ten studies (59%) described the overlap population at least partially. Sixteen studies (94%) highlighted at least one statistical advantage of overlap weighting, yet none acknowledged that results apply only to the overlap population. These results point to a notable gap in estimand reporting.
Conclusion:
Clearer specification of the estimand and its target population is essential to prevent misinterpretation. Strengthening reporting standards will support more transparent and appropriate use of overlap weighting in medical research.
Plain Language Summary:
This study examined how major medical journals (from 2020-2025) report studies using overlap weighting, a method that focuses on patients who could receive either treatment. Most studies acknowledged advantages of using overlap weighting but did not clearly state that results apply only to this "overlap" group. Clear reporting of the target population and effect estimate is needed to avoid misleading interpretations.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Mass and Weight
Mass and Weight
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies