Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
A tridimensional framework for governance in the wildland-urban interface using Pyro-Socio-Ecological Zones.
Onofrio Cappelluti1, Francisco J Escobedo2, Giovanni Sanesi1
1Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Amendola 165/A, Bari, Italy.
Urban-wildland interfaces present complex wildfire risks. A new Pyro-Socio-Ecological Zone (PSEZ) framework reveals governance impacts wildfire frequency and area differently across Italy and California, highlighting the need for context-specific approaches.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Ecology
- Urban Planning
Background:
- Wildfire risk is increasing at urban-wildland interfaces.
- Existing methods often overlook diverse socioeconomic, governance, and ecological factors.
- These interfaces are critical zones of human-nature interaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and map a novel tri-dimensional Pyro-Socio-Ecological Zone (PSEZ) framework.
- To analyze wildfire patterns in relation to ecological, socioeconomic, and governance contexts.
- To compare wildfire dynamics in southern Italy and southern California.
Main Methods:
- Developed a PSEZ framework using composite indicators.
- Mapped PSEZs across southern Italy and southern California.
- Analyzed the relationship between PSEZ characteristics and wildfire occurrence/severity.
Main Results:
- In California, higher governance levels correlated with fewer wildfires.
- In Italy, low governance areas had fewer wildfires but larger burned areas; high governance areas had more wildfires but smaller burned areas.
- Significant differences in PSEZ distribution and wildfire governance implications were observed between Italy and California.
Conclusions:
- Wildfire governance impacts vary significantly by geographic and socioeconomic context.
- The PSEZ framework provides a nuanced understanding of complex socio-ecological interactions.
- Caution is advised when applying methods developed in one region to fire-prone landscapes in different geographies.
More Related Videos
09:44Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
11:53Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Use of a GIS
Thematic Layering in GIS
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Hybrid Zones
Zones of Protection
Protective zones are defined by closed dashed lines, containing one or more components. A key characteristic of these zones is the strategic placement of...