Protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of spontaneous breathing trial in children with and

José Colleti Junior1, Orlei Ribeiro de Araujo2, Karina Tavares Weber1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.

Critical Care Science
|December 19, 2025
PubMed

Insights

This study compares continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to pressure support during spontaneous breathing trials in children needing mechanical ventilation. The goal is to determine if CPAP is non-inferior to pressure support for successful extubation.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric critical care medicine
  • Respiratory physiology
  • Clinical trial methodology

Background:

  • Mechanical ventilation weaning is critical for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients.
  • Optimal spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) methods lack robust evidence.
  • This study addresses the need for evidence-based SBT approaches in children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the non-inferiority of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus pressure support (PS) during SBT in mechanically ventilated children.
  • To evaluate successful liberation from mechanical ventilation as the primary outcome.
  • To assess secondary outcomes including post-extubation respiratory support and PICU length of stay.

Main Methods:

  • Multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (NCT06593288).
  • Inclusion: Children < 18 years, > 36 weeks corrected gestational age, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 24 hours and ready for weaning.
  • Randomization to CPAP or PS during SBT; primary outcome: successful liberation ≥ 48 hours post-extubation.

Main Results:

  • Study results are anticipated within one year of completion.
  • The primary outcome is successful extubation and liberation from mechanical ventilation.
  • Secondary outcomes focus on respiratory support needs and PICU length of stay.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence guiding SBT in critically ill children is limited.
  • This trial rigorously compares CPAP and pressure support during SBT.
  • Findings will inform optimal weaning strategies for pediatric mechanical ventilation.
Abstract