Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

05:41
Author Spotlight: Integrating Ultrasound Imaging with Biochemical Markers for Thyroid Disease Diagnosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
1.0K
Bridging Policy and Practice in Telemedicine Follow-Up Identification: Multicenter Mixed Methods Study in Beijing
Yanli Lyu1,2,3, Xi Li4, Huixian Li1,2
1Office of Internet Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
JMIR Human Factors
|December 19, 2025
Summary
Telemedicine services in Beijing show discrepancies between policy and practice in patient eligibility assessments. Findings suggest clearer policies and relaxed regulations for new patients to improve telemedicine accessibility.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Digital Health
- Healthcare Policy
Background:
- Telemedicine services have seen rapid global development, gaining popularity in China after a 2018 policy change.
- Implementation and effectiveness of telemedicine, particularly for follow-up patients, require further understanding across diverse medical institutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate patient eligibility assessment processes for telemedicine in Beijing's medical institutions.
- To understand institutional rationales for telemedicine adoption and analyze policy-practice discrepancies.
- To provide insights for future telemedicine service development.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods study involving 36 top-ranking medical institutions in Beijing.
- Quantitative phase: Questionnaires on assessment processes and patient prerequisites.
- Qualitative phase: Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with institutional contacts.
Main Results:
- 36 institutions handled nearly 1 million telemedicine visits, with most using a two-stage eligibility assessment.
- Nonprofit hospitals predominantly used automatic assessments, often with stricter location criteria than policy required.
- Key discrepancies stemmed from distrust in other institutions and difficulties with interinstitutional disputes.
Conclusions:
- This study highlights significant discrepancies between telemedicine policy and practice in Beijing's patient eligibility assessments.
- Policy ambiguity and institutional priorities contribute to these variations.
- Recommendations include enhancing policy clarity, easing regulations for new patients, and improving service oversight.
Keywords:
BeijingChinaassessment processfollow-up visithealth policymanagementmixed methodsprerequisitequalitytelemedicine services
