Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Comparative validation of PREDICT versions 3.1 and 2.2 for overall survival in the Dutch breast cancer population
Lara W A Vreven1, Elfi M Verheul2, Marissa C van Maaren3
1Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Background:
PREDICT Breast is a clinical decision-support tool estimating prognosis and the absolute benefit of adjuvant systemic therapies in early breast cancer. PREDICT v2.2 is recommended in Dutch guidelines. Both v2.2 and the recently updated v3.1 have not been validated in the Dutch population. This study compares the predictive performance of PREDICT v3.1 and v2.2 for 10-year OS in Dutch breast cancer patients.
Methods:
Women diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 with primary invasive breast cancer were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Ten-year OS predictions from v2.2 and v3.1 were compared with observed OS for the overall cohort and 36 subgroups defined by oestrogen receptor (ER) status, HER2-status, age, and tumour stage. Discrimination (ability to distinguish patients with different outcomes) and calibration (agreement between predicted and observed outcomes) of both models were assessed.
Results:
Among 101,282 patients, both versions showed moderate discrimination (AUC v2.2 = 0.768; v3.1 = 0.775) and calibration (v2.2 intercept: 0.07; slope: 1.09; v3.1 intercept: 0.12, slope: 1.00). V3.1 slightly overestimated (1.9%), whereas v2.2 slightly underestimated (1.6%) 10-year OS. Across subgroups, v3.1 generally outperformed v2.2 except in patients aged >75 years, where v2.2 provided more accurate estimates. In ER-/HER- patients aged 50-75 years, v3.1 overestimated (1.5-2.8%) and v2.2 underestimated (2.8-5.3%) 10-year OS.
Conclusion:
Both PREDICT v2.2 and v3.1 accurately predict 10-year OS in Dutch breast cancer patients, with small differences between versions that vary by subgroup. No single model is optimal for all patients highlighting the need for subgroup-specific recalibration and careful interpretation when applying PREDICT.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

