Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
Published on: August 29, 2014
How does habitat use influence PFAS contamination in wildlife? Combining stable isotopes and GPS tracking in three
David Rozen-Rechels1, Prescillia Lemesle2, William Jouanneau3
1Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Univ Paris Est Créteil, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Institut d'écologie et des Sciences de l'environnement de Paris, IEES Paris, F-75005, Paris, France; Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS - La Rochelle Université, Villiers-en-Bois, 79360, France.
Abstract:
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are toxic and persistent compounds widely distributed in the environment and accumulate in top predators, including seabirds. Because of the biomagnification potentials of some PFAS, diet is thought to be a key exposure route for PFAS. However, other factors such as habitat use, may mask interspecific differences in PFAS exposure expected from trophic structure. Among seabirds, gulls are generalists that forage in both terrestrial and marine habitats, making them relevant models to concurrently investigate the influence of foraging habitats and trophic position on PFAS exposure. We combined plasma PFAS concentrations with GPS tracking and stable isotopes to define foraging habitats (δ13C; δ34S; GPS) and trophic positions (δ15N) in three sympatric gull species breeding in France (Isle of Ré). In herring gulls (Larus argentatus), long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) were positively correlated with high trophic resources from marine habitats. We found compound- and sex-dependent relationships between PFAS concentrations and stable isotope values in lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus), while no association was found with habitat use. No association was found between PFAS levels and stable isotopes in great black-backed gulls (Larus marinus). Our study suggests that coastal habitat could be a source of PFCA contamination and highlights that the influence of habitat use on gull exposure to PFAS varied depending on species, sex, and compounds.
More Related Videos
11:14Fatty Acid 13C Isotopologue Profiling Provides Insight into Trophic Carbon Transfer and Lipid Metabolism of Invertebrate Consumers
Published on: April 17, 2018
10:17Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
Published on: October 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Habitat Fragmentation
Conservation of Declining Populations