Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication
Published on: June 5, 2016
A Single, Interpretable Vocal Biomarker for Enriching Antipsychotic Clinical Trials
Alex S Cohen1, Brian Kirkpatrick2, Mark Opler3
1Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Center for Computation and Technology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Quantic Innovations, Inc., Benton, Arkansas.
Speech latency, an objective measure of verbal response time, can identify patients who benefit from schizophrenia treatment. Using this vocal biomarker in clinical trials significantly improves outcomes and reduces participant numbers.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Neuroscience
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Speech latency, an objective measure of verbal response time, is sensitive to cognitive, social, and motivational factors.
- Previous research indicates speech latency can enrich participants in antidepressant trials, nearly doubling the drug-placebo effect.
- This study investigates speech latency as an enrichment tool in a schizophrenia clinical trial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if speech latency enrichment improves outcomes in a schizophrenia clinical trial.
- To assess the utility of speech latency as a predictive biomarker for treatment response.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 2,320 audio recordings from psychiatric interviews of 406 participants in a Phase 3 schizophrenia trial.
- Participants were from three countries, spoke eight languages, and received brilaroxazine monotherapy.
- Speech latency was measured and analyzed for internal consistency, stability, and correlation with negative symptoms.
Main Results:
- Speech latency demonstrated excellent internal consistency and temporal stability.
- Patients with moderate-to-severe negative symptoms exhibited significantly longer speech latencies (Cohen's d=0.83 to 1.47).
- A vocal biomarker (VBM-pos) derived from speech latency identified participants with longer latencies, in whom brilaroxazine showed statistically significant and large treatment effects versus placebo.
Conclusions:
- Speech latency is a valid, objective biomarker from standard clinical interviews.
- Utilizing speech latency as an enrichment tool reduces sample size requirements and enhances clinical trial outcomes.
- This approach has significant implications for lowering the cost and burden of clinical trials.
More Related Videos
05:48Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
Published on: August 9, 2024
08:33Olfactory Neurons Obtained through Nasal Biopsy Combined with Laser-Capture Microdissection: A Potential Approach to Study Treatment Response in Mental Disorders
Published on: December 4, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Antipsychotic Drugs: Typical and Atypical Agents
Clinical Trials: Overview
Schizophrenia