Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
Published on: February 26, 2014
When randomisation goes horribly wrong: examples of major failures of randomisation and strategies to avoid them
Lisa N Yelland1,2, Kylie M Lange1,3, Sabine Braat4,5
1Women and Kids Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Background:
Randomisation forms the foundation of clinical trials, but its implementation can be prone to error. Often randomisation errors affect few participants and do not seriously compromise the integrity of the trial. However, in some cases randomisation errors can have widespread consequences and call into question the validity of trial conclusions. Published articles may be retracted as a result. Valuable insight can be gained from studying past errors to minimise the risk of similar errors and their disastrous consequences impacting future trials. The aims of this article are to (i) describe examples of major failures of randomisation, and (ii) provide guidance on how to avoid them in practice.
Methods:
Major failures of randomisation were defined as inadvertent errors that affected many trial participants and occurred during the process of designing the randomisation scheme, generating the randomisation schedule, allocating participants to treatment groups, or providing the assigned treatment. Examples of major failures of randomisation were drawn from author experience and through a review of the published literature, which included a systematic search of the Retraction Watch Database for serious randomisation problems that led to the retraction of a published article. Practice points to avoid such errors were developed by consensus among the authors.
Results:
Examples are provided of seven broad types of major failures of randomisation: randomisation schedule followed incorrectly, randomisation schedule sorted incorrectly, randomisation schedule too short, clusters handled incorrectly, incorrect or unknown treatment provided at randomisation, poorly designed randomisation scheme, and programming errors in adaptive randomisation schemes. Practice points for avoiding such errors are presented, including suggestions for written documentation, staff training, and thorough testing of the randomisation process prior to trial commencement.
Conclusions:
Randomisation is of fundamental importance in clinical trials. Greater consideration should be given to the potential for major failures of randomisation and strategies to avoid them. When major failures of randomisation do occur, greater transparency in reporting is needed.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:46Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Random Error