Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thermally activated persulfate-driven rapid abiotic carbon source production of food waste: Performance, organic matter evolution and denitrification potential.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

EGR1 Mediates Ursodeoxycholic Acid-Promoted Mitophagy to Prevent Postovulatory Aging of Porcine Oocytes.

Aging cell·2026
Same author

Formononetin alleviates LPS-induced neuroinflammation in mice by modulating inflammatory signaling pathways.

Journal of oleo science·2026
Same author

The pyroptosis cascade between inflammatory endothelial cells and microglia facilitates BBB disruption in bacterial meningitis.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Helicobacter pylori promotes dendritic cells maturation and inflammation via outer membrane vesicles.

Microbiological research·2026
Same author

Tailored HER2 ECD mRNA-LNP vaccines boost CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell-mediated antitumor immunity for HER2-positive tumor suppression.

Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy·2026
Same journal

Multiomics Profiling During Autoimmune Demyelination Highlights a Complex Regulatory Role for Ataxin-1 in B Cells.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Global Trends in Light Pollution and Their Relationship With Socioeconomic Factors.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Wired for Corruption: Inter-Brain Synchrony Encodes Bribery-Related Value Information and Predicts Bribery Agreement.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

LM-YOLO: A Lightweight Multi-Scale Enhanced Model for Forest Smoke Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

DARTS-CNN-BiLSTM: Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Computer Numerical Control Machine Tool Feed System.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

24.1K

Stimulus Novelty Inhibits Reward Evaluation: EEG Evidence.

Xiaoya Li1,2, Ziyang Yang1,2, Guanglong Liu1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|December 20, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Stimulus novelty reduces reward evaluation, especially for gains, when it’s a contextual cue. This effect lessens as novelty habituates, supporting the novelty inhibition hypothesis.

Keywords:
EEGreward evaluationstimulus novelty

More Related Videos

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

7.3K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

561

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

24.1K
An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

7.3K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

561

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Rewards are often encountered in new situations, but their impact on reward processing in novel contexts is not well understood.
  • Understanding how novelty influences the brain's evaluation of rewards is crucial for comprehending decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms by which stimulus novelty affects reward evaluation.
  • To determine if novelty’s role (as feedback attribute vs. contextual modulator) alters its impact on reward processing.

Main Methods:

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to record brain activity in 99 participants across two experiments.
  • Participants completed a monetary guessing task involving gains and losses presented in novel or familiar forms.
  • Stimulus novelty was manipulated either as part of the feedback or as a separate contextual cue.

Main Results:

  • When novelty was integrated into feedback, it reduced reward-related neural signals irrespective of feedback valence.
  • As a contextual modulator, novelty selectively attenuated neural responses to gains, but not losses.
  • This gain-specific inhibitory effect weakened with habituation to novelty, regardless of its role.

Conclusions:

  • Stimulus novelty generally inhibits reward evaluation, particularly for gains, supporting the novelty inhibition hypothesis.
  • The specific role of novelty (embedded in feedback or as context) modulates its inhibitory effect on neural reward signals.
  • Neural responses to reward are sensitive to the context and habituation of novelty.