Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Exploring Protein-Glycan Interactions: Advances in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Published on: August 26, 2025
The impact of N-glycan conformational entropy on the binding affinity of Fc γ receptor IIIa/CD16a
Paul G Kremer1, William D Tolbert2, Eliza Gazaway3
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
The affinity of Fc γ receptor IIIa (FcγRIIIa) binding to immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) correlates with patient responses for antibody-based therapeutics. Among multiple factors affecting affinity, a mechanism defining how the composition of the FcγRIIIa N162 glycan regulates affinity remains undefined. Here, we evaluate the binding modes of two competitive FcγRIIIa ligands. IgG1 Fc binding is sensitive to N162 glycan composition, unlike the antigen-binding fragment (Fab) of the FcγRIII-specific antibody 3G8. Both ligands bound to overlapping surfaces, utilizing different angles of attack such that the IgG1 Fc but not 3G8 Fab limited the space available to the FcγRIII N162 N-glycan. FcγRIII binding to IgG1 Fc generated a 2.1 kcal/mol penalty from a loss of N162 glycan conformational entropy, greater than the 0.3 kcal/mol penalty for 3G8 and consistent with binding measurements. Thus, the conformational entropy of the FcγRIIIa N162-glycan is the predominant force modulating differential binding affinity compared to 3G8 Fab binding for endogenous FcγRIIIa glycoforms.
The affinity of Fc γ receptor IIIa (FcγRIIIa) binding to immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) correlates with patient responses for antibody-based therapeutics. Among multiple factors affecting affinity, a mechanism defining how the composition of the FcγRIIIa N162 glycan regulates affinity remains undefined. Here, we evaluate the binding modes of two competitive FcγRIIIa ligands. IgG1 Fc binding is sensitive to N162 glycan composition, unlike the antigen-binding fragment (Fab) of the FcγRIII-specific antibody 3G8. Both ligands bound to overlapping surfaces, utilizing different angles of attack such that the IgG1 Fc but not 3G8 Fab limited the space available to the FcγRIII N162 N-glycan. FcγRIII binding to IgG1 Fc generated a 2.1 kcal/mol penalty from a loss of N162 glycan conformational entropy, greater than the 0.3 kcal/mol penalty for 3G8 and consistent with binding measurements. Thus, the conformational entropy of the FcγRIIIa N162-glycan is the predominant force modulating differential binding affinity compared to 3G8 Fab binding for endogenous FcγRIIIa glycoforms.
Related Concept Videos
Immunoglobulin-like Cell Adhesion Molecules
Ig-CAMs exhibit either homophilic binding (to other Ig-CAMs) or heterophilic binding (to other ligands such as integrins). While most Ig-CAMs...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Ligand Binding and Linkage
GPCR Desensitization

