Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
The Pharmaceutically Enhanced Reinforcement for Reduced Alcohol and Smoking (PERRAS) Study: Protocol for a randomized
Paola Palombo1, Nicole Akana2, Abigail Bowen2
1Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States of America; Analytics and PsychoPharmacology Laboratory (APPL), Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States of America; Program of Excellence in Addiction Research (PEAR), Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States of America; Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States of America; Department of Psychobiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background:
Alcohol and tobacco are often used together, and their co-use is directly associated with a high incidence of morbidity and mortality. While there are currently no guidelines for treating co-addiction to alcohol and tobacco, studies suggest that integrated approaches may effectively reduce the use of both substances. Grounded in the Addiction Neuroclinical Assessment (ANA) framework, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining Contingency Management (CM) for Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) with Varenicline for smoking cessation to significantly reduce alcohol and tobacco use among individuals with an AUD who smoke and are seeking treatment. In addition, the study will evaluate the mediator effect of the ANA domains, systematically measured and evaluated to determine their role in treatment outcomes.
Methods:
Study will take place in Spokane-WA. After a two-week induction period, a total of 205 eligible participants will be randomized into one of two 12-week treatment conditions in equal proportions: CM + varenicline (experimental condition) and Non-Contingent (NC) + varenicline (control condition). Participants in the CM + varenicline group will receive rewards contingent on the submission of negative alcohol samples, while the NC + varenicline group will receive rewards for submitting urine samples, independent of alcohol positivity. Primary outcomes include objective verification of abstinence during the 12-week intervention phase (measured thrice-weekly). Follow-up evaluations will be conducted during the first, third, and sixth months.
Conclusions:
If demonstrated to be efficacious, this treatment approach has the potential to produce important health benefits for a highly prevalent population in desperate need for an integrated treatment. It may also assist in identifying how different ANA-based responses impact treatment outcomes.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
07:50A Method for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Ethanol in Rats without Water Deprivation, Saccharin Fading or Extended Access Training
Published on: January 29, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs