Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell
Gargi Kothari1, Kenneth J O'Byrne2, Chris Brown3
1Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Purpose:
Programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors have improved metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis. Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) may enhance immunity. This study evaluated the activity and safety of adding SABR to first-line immunotherapy post chemotherapy with nivolumab for metastatic NSCLC.
Methods And Materials:
NIVORAD (ALTG14/002/CT0135/TROG 16.01) randomized adults (1:2) to nivolumab 240 mg 2-weekly until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity either alone, or with single fraction SABR (18-20 Gy). Eligible patients had metastatic NSCLC, had progressed after 1-2 lines of chemotherapy, were immunotherapy-naïve, and had a disease site suitable for SABR. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were objective tumor response rate, overall survival, PFS at 1 and 2 years, and adverse events (AEs). The planned sample size of 120 was to provide 80% power with a 1-sided type 1 error rate of 5% to distinguish the observed proportions alive and progression free at 6 months. The study closed early because of slow accrual.
Results:
Fifty participants were recruited and randomly assigned to nivolumab alone (n = 16) or nivolumab plus SABR (n = 34). Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment arms, apart from percentage of females which was higher in the control arm (56% vs 35%). Median follow-up was 26 months. PFS was similar among those assigned nivolumab plus SABR versus nivolumab alone (PFS at 6 months 49% vs 44%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.36-1.27; P = .23). Objective tumor response rate (8/34[24%] vs 4/16[25%]) and overall survival (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.43-1.75; P = .69) were also similar in the 2 treatment groups. Rates of serious grade 3-5 AE (12/16 (75%) vs 24/31 (77%) in experimental arm) were also similar in the 2 groups. There were 2 deaths, 1 in each treatment group (pneumonitis and respiratory failure).
Conclusions:
Nivolumab plus SABR demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to nivolumab alone in metastatic NSCLC progressing after chemotherapy, without increased AEs.
More Related Videos
08:54Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy