Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
Published on: August 4, 2022
Jumping to predictions: Auditory and visual prediction in hurdling
Sophie Siestrup1, Marc Dührkop1, Viviana Villafañe Barraza2
1Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Fliednerstraße 21, 48149 Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Fliednerstraße 21, 48149 Münster, Germany.
The brain uses internal models to predict movement when sensory input is missing. Hurdling training improved these predictions, especially for visual information, showing flexible brain network recruitment.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Motor Control
Background:
- The brain integrates multisensory information (auditory, visual) to create a coherent perception.
- Internal predictive models, shaped by experience, are crucial for maintaining perception during sensory deprivation.
- Complex movements like hurdling require sophisticated sensorimotor integration and prediction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the brain compensates for temporary auditory and visual masking during a movement prediction task.
- To examine the neural mechanisms underlying prediction accuracy and reliance on internal models.
- To assess the impact of sensorimotor training (hurdling) on predictive capabilities and neural activation patterns.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to monitor brain activity in participants watching masked hurdling videos.
- Participants performed a movement prediction task under conditions of visual masking, auditory masking, or combined masking.
- A six-week hurdling training intervention was implemented between fMRI sessions to enhance sensorimotor models.
Main Results:
- Prediction accuracy decreased significantly when auditory or visual input was masked.
- Under visual masking, participants showed increased reliance on auditory input and engaged frontal, motor, and visual areas, suggesting top-down visual prediction.
- Hurdling training improved prediction accuracy, and associated neural changes were observed in frontal control and visuomotor regions, indicating enhanced internal models for visual prediction.
Conclusions:
- The brain flexibly recruits modality-specific networks based on available sensory input, utilizing top-down predictions when visual information is absent.
- Sensorimotor training strengthens internal models, leading to more efficient predictive processing, particularly for visual information.
- These findings highlight the dynamic interplay between sensory input, internal models, and motor learning in perceptual prediction.
Related Concept Videos
Auditory Pathway
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
Hydraulic Jump: Problem Solving
Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve
Auditory Perception
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Hearing

