Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.9K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.9K
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

929
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
929
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.4K
Non-destructive Tests for Concrete Strength01:12

Non-destructive Tests for Concrete Strength

449
The rebound hammer test, also known as the Schmidt hammer test, is a non-destructive technique for evaluating the hardness of concrete and, indirectly, the strength of concrete. It operates on the principle that the rebound of a spring-driven mass from a concrete surface correlates to the surface's hardness. The device comprises a mass within a tubular housing, a spring mechanism, and a plunger that strikes the concrete. Upon release, the energy imparted to the mass by the spring causes it...
449

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Calciphylaxis in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the liver.

World journal of virology·2023
Same author

Pediatric Sepsis: The Importance of Understanding Criteria for Diagnosis.

Pediatric annals·2022
Same author

The magnitude of anemia and preventive practices in mothers with children under five years of age in Dodi Papase, Volta region of Ghana.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Current advancements and future prospects of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics: a narrative review.

Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy·2022
Same author

Reactogenicity to COVID-19 vaccination in the United States of America.

Clinical and experimental vaccine research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K

The Test Pyramid 2.0: AI-assisted testing across the pyramid.

Priyank Desai1, Snahil Singh1, Shubham Amilkanthwar2

  • 1Independent Researcher, Seattle, WA, United States.

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
|December 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces "The Test Pyramid 2.0," integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and DevSecOps into software testing. This framework enhances efficiency, reduces defects, and improves system resilience for modern development.

Keywords:
DevSecOpsartificial intelligencecontinuous integrationquality assurancesecurity testingshift leftsoftware testing

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
05:26

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K
Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
05:26

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Software Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cybersecurity

Background:

  • Modern software development faces challenges in test coverage, code quality, and security due to increasing complexity and accelerated release cycles.
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) has introduced productivity gains, further intensifying these challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a conceptual framework, "The Test Pyramid 2.0", for integrating AI and DevSecOps into engineering workflows.
  • To enhance efficiency, reduce defect leakage, and create more resilient systems.

Main Methods:

  • Examining AI's role in enhancing test pyramid layers (automated test generation, coverage analysis, data synthesis, anomaly detection, UI exploration).
  • Embedding DevSecOps practices within the pyramid (static analysis, policy enforcement, dynamic testing, misconfiguration detection, adversarial simulation).
  • Exploring AI's contribution to strengthening security practices (adaptive learning, risk prioritization, context-aware detection).

Main Results:

  • AI-augmented testing strategies improve efficiency and reduce defect leakage.
  • Integrated DevSecOps practices enhance the security posture across all testing layers.
  • The framework provides a holistic approach to quality and safety in accelerated development.

Conclusions:

  • "The Test Pyramid 2.0" offers a clear path to leverage AI and DevSecOps for robust software testing.
  • This integrated strategy supports rapid development without compromising quality or safety.
  • It enables the creation of more resilient and secure software systems.