Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Spatial Measurements of Perfusion, Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Liposomes Accumulation in Solid Tumors
Published on: August 18, 2016
Mapping drug distribution using CT imaging following direct tissue injection in ex vivo liver: informing clinical
Robert Morhard1, Michal Mauda-Havakuk1,2, Jose F Delgado1
1Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.
Purpose:
Direct intratumoral injection of therapeutic drugs can minimize total dose and adverse effects compared to systemic administration. Leakage from the injection site may cause variable drug distribution and efficacy, and off-target toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the co-injection of an iodinated contrast agent with an imageable surrogate drug (fluorescent albumin) to estimate spatial drug distribution.
Methods:
Fluorescent albumin and iodixanol were injected (1, 2, or 4 mL at 1 mL/min) into ex vivo bovine liver. Distribution of iodine on CT was compared to fluorescent albumin on fluorescence microscopy, including comparison of distribution volume in liver as a function of injected volume. Physical properties (hydrodynamic diameter, zeta potential) of both iodixanol and fluorescent albumin were measured.
Results:
In comparison to fluorescent albumin, iodixanol is smaller (2.7 ± 0.4 nm vs. 17.0 ± 1.7 nm) and more neutrally charged (2.3 ± 0.5 mV vs. - 17.7 ± 1.4 mV). The distribution volume of iodixanol in tissue is approximately 7 times greater than that of fluorescent albumin. However, the correlation of distribution volumes of both agents is R 2 = 0.89. The variance in distribution volume in tissue of iodixanol and fluorescent albumin increased with injection volume.
Conclusion:
The distributions of contrast and surrogate drug were correlated; however, differing physicochemical properties caused differences in their distribution. Although drug and contrast may not colocalize, contrast may serve as an imageable surrogate to inform preclinical development and clinical applications. This study suggests that dividing an interstitial injection into multifocal small-volume injections results in better localization of the injected drug at the target.
Trial Registration:
NCT04840615.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44343-025-00027-x.
More Related Videos
08:41Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
09:23Author Spotlight: Enhancing Transplantation Research Through MicroCT Angiography in Murine Models
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Drug Distribution: Tissue Binding
For...
Tissue-Drug Binding: Localization of Drugs and its Significance
Drugs can bind to different tissue components, enhancing their distribution and localization. The factors influencing drug localization in tissues include the drug's lipophilicity, structural characteristics, tissue perfusion rate, and pH differences. These factors determine the...