Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: August 1, 2017
Implementation of GLASS-AMR: An assessment in WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Region
Mohamed Sarhan1, Shaffi Fazaludeen Koya1, Elizabeth Tayler2
1World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.
The Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) faced challenges in data quality and timeliness across the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Focusing on sustainability and data quality is crucial for effective national antimicrobial resistance surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Global Health Security
Background:
- The Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) was established to monitor antimicrobial resistance (AMR) globally.
- Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to public health worldwide, necessitating robust surveillance systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the implementation of the GLASS AMR surveillance system in the World Health Organization's Eastern Mediterranean Region.
- To assess the key attributes of the GLASS AMR system using a mixed-methods approach.
Main Methods:
- Adapted the US Centers for Disease Control framework for evaluation.
- Utilized mixed methods, including document review, analysis of surveillance data, and triangulation with national focal points.
- Reviewed GLASS documents, reports, Regional External Quality Assessment Scheme (REQAS) data, and WHO consultant reports.
Main Results:
- All countries in the region submitted data to GLASS by 2022, but representativeness varied.
- Complex data management and reporting requirements, alongside potential issues in patient selection and laboratory quality assurance, impacted data sensitivity and quality.
- While data quality showed some strengths compared to other WHO regions, significant inter-country variations in quality and completeness were observed.
- The system's yearly reporting structure limited timely local feedback loops for decision-making.
Conclusions:
- Variable data quality, sensitivity, representativeness, and timeliness may have hindered the system's utility for guiding decision-making.
- Future implementation of national AMR surveillance systems must prioritize sustainability and the generation and utilization of high-quality data for prompt interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this principle...
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.

