Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Measuring Photophysiology of Attached Stage of Colacium sp. by a Cuvette-Type Fast Repetition Rate Fluorometer
Published on: November 12, 2021
Experimental and field comparisons of two common methods for measuring microzooplankton grazing rates
Jennifer L Beatty1, Brittany P Stewart1, Kendra A Turk-Kubo2
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Introduction:
Grazing on picoplankton by microbial eukaryotes is a fundamental process within aquatic food webs, particularly in oligotrophic regions that are typically dominated by picophytoplankton. Remarkably, classical methods that have been used for decades to measure this process in the field have rarely been evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions where true rates of prey mortality can be quantified and compared to experimental results. This study evaluated two commonly used field techniques to estimate phytoplankton mortality rates by microbial consumers, the dilution technique and the disappearance of fluorescently labeled bacteria (FLB).
Methods:
An elaborate laboratory experiment was first conducted comparing picophytoplankton mortality rates measured using these two techniques to rates observed directly in culture based on changes in prey abundance, using the cyanobacterium, Prochlorococcus, as prey for a nanozooplanktonic grazer, Paraphysomonas bandaiensis. Secondly, a field experiment was performed in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre off Hawai'i to compare the mortality rates estimated by the two methods.
Results:
Summed across multiple treatments in the laboratory, mortality rates estimated by FLB disappearance displayed high variability and on average underestimated observed mortality rates by ∼27%. The dilution technique also underestimated observed mortality rates (by ∼54%) but displayed lower variance (yielding an approximately 27% difference between the two methods). In contrast to laboratory results, field experiments resulted in an order of magnitude difference between grazer-mediated mortality rates using the two methods.
Discussion:
Our laboratory results revealed that both methods yielded reasonable albeit somewhat underestimated mortality rates in the laboratory setup, while differences between the two methods in our field studies implied that the underlying assumptions of one or both methods were not met. These findings advocate for caution in interpreting quantitative assessments of protistan-based mortality rates using these long-used approaches.
More Related Videos
08:56Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
Published on: January 13, 2023
08:57VacuSIP, an Improved InEx Method for In Situ Measurement of Particulate and Dissolved Compounds Processed by Active Suspension Feeders
Published on: August 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...