Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Biological Samples Preparation for Speciation at Cryogenic Temperature using High-Resolution X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Published on: May 27, 2022
Investigation of Sample Preparation Methods of Dietary Supplements for Total Selenium Determination
Larissa M A Oliveira1, Diogo P Moraes1, Juliana S F Pereira1
1Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Química, Porto Alegre, RS 91501-970, Brazil.
Abstract:
This study investigated three sample preparation methods for digestion of dietary supplements prior to selenium (Se) determination by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF AAS), such as conductive heating digestion, microwave-assisted wet digestion (MWAD), and microwave-induced combustion (MIC). In wet digestion methods, variable nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide concentrations were evaluated. For MIC, a diluted nitric acid concentration was also investigated as absorbing solution, while microcrystalline cellulose was employed as a combustion aid. The optimized conditions were: 250 mg of the sample with 5 mol L-1 nitric acid and 30% w/w hydrogen peroxide (160 °C, 5 h) for conductive heating; 350 mg with 2.5 mol L-1 nitric acid and 30% w/w hydrogen peroxide (180 °C, 40 min) for MWAD; and 200 mg of sample, 300 mg of microcrystalline cellulose, and 0.25 mol L-1 nitric acid as the absorbing solution (29.2 bar, > 1000 °C during the combustion reaction and 180 °C, 20 min in the reflux step) for MIC. Digestion efficiency was evaluated by residual carbon content (RCC) and residual acidity (RA) in final solutions. The greenness of each method was evaluated by using the AGREEprep software. Selenium was quantified by GF AAS using Pd as the chemical modifier using pyrolysis and atomization temperatures of 1200 and 2000 °C, respectively. The limits of detection (LOD) obtained for Se were 1.71, 0.84, and 0.08 μg g-1 for conductive heating, MWAD, and MIC, respectively, with agreement of 96.7-99.5% for the selenium-enriched yeast certified reference material. Although all methods showed good agreement (ANOVA, 95% confidence level), MIC was the most efficient, providing the lowest RCC (0.1%) and RA (0.5%) values, better LOD, and a greenness score of 0.49.
Related Concept Videos
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Overview
Bulk or large solid samples are typically reduced in size using grinding, crushing, or milling techniques to increase the...
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...

