Dynamic and selective competition governs binding of large tumor suppressor 1 to KIBRA and YAP
Sanjay Ramprasad1, Kasie Baker1, Diego J Rodriguez1
1Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Abstract:
The Hippo signaling pathway regulates tissue growth and homeostasis through WW domain-containing proteins, which often target the same PPxY-containing partners. However, the mechanisms that determine how multiple WW proteins compete for a single substrate remain unclear. Here, we investigate how Kidney and Brain Expressed Protein (KIBRA) and Yes-Associated Protein (YAP), two tandem WW domain effectors of the Hippo pathway, interact with the dual-PPxY motifs of the Large Tumor Suppressor 1 (LATS1) kinase. Using complementary biophysical methods, including isothermal titration calorimetry, analytical ultracentrifugation, multi-angle light scattering, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) spectroscopy, we show that KIBRA preferentially recognizes the second motif (P2), while YAP simultaneously engages both motifs. Although YAP binds LATS1 with approximately twice the affinity of KIBRA, competition experiments demonstrate that neither protein has a competitive advantage. Instead, they form mutually exclusive binary complexes that remain in a dynamic equilibrium, with no evidence of a stable ternary KIBRA-YAP-LATS1 assembly. Residue-level NMR titrations further reveal that KIBRA and YAP occupy overlapping but distinct interfaces at the P2 site, with binding governed by site-specific conformational dynamics rather than affinity alone. This dynamic, interface-specific mode of competition uncovers a mechanism in which WW domain selectivity is modulated through structural adaptability. By revealing how WW domain competition operates at the molecular level, these findings highlight new avenues for therapeutic intervention in growth control.
Insights
Kidney and Brain Expressed Protein (KIBRA) and Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) compete dynamically for Large Tumor Suppressor 1 (LATS1) binding. This competition, governed by structural adaptability, reveals new therapeutic targets for controlling tissue growth.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Biophysics
- Cell Signaling
Background:
- The Hippo signaling pathway controls tissue growth and homeostasis.
- WW domain proteins are key regulators, often competing for PPxY-containing partners.
- Mechanisms of competition among WW domain proteins remain poorly understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the interaction and competition between KIBRA and YAP with LATS1.
- To elucidate the molecular mechanisms governing WW domain protein competition for substrates.
Main Methods:
- Utilized isothermal titration calorimetry, analytical ultracentrifugation, multi-angle light scattering, and NMR spectroscopy.
- Performed competition experiments and residue-level NMR titrations.
Main Results:
- KIBRA preferentially binds the second PPxY motif (P2) of LATS1, while YAP binds both motifs.
- YAP exhibits higher affinity for LATS1, but neither protein has a competitive advantage.
- KIBRA and YAP form mutually exclusive binary complexes in dynamic equilibrium, not a stable ternary complex.
- Binding is influenced by overlapping yet distinct interfaces and site-specific conformational dynamics.
Conclusions:
- WW domain competition is regulated by structural adaptability and dynamic interactions, not solely by binding affinity.
- This study reveals a novel mechanism of WW domain selectivity modulation.
- Findings offer insights for therapeutic strategies targeting growth control pathways.
More Related Videos
15:05Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Published on: May 20, 2020
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Abnormal Proliferation
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Negative Regulator Molecules
