Assessment of errors in analytic modeling of permanent magnet electron spectrometers for laser-plasma accelerators

We assess the error in three treatments of a critical electron beam diagnostic for laser-plasma acceleration (LPA) experiments: a permanent magnet electron spectrometer. Since LPA electron spectrometers are often difficult to calibrate due to the scarcity of well-characterized, tunable electron beam sources in the appropriate energy range and the mechanical complexity of electron spectrometers, the standard of calibration is Hall probe measurements. We first compare the electron spectrometer performance between SIMION calculations and the Hall probe measurements. We find up to a 60% (<8%) error in determining the absolute energy for electrons below (above) 80 MeV when using the SIMION-modeled magnetic field vs the measured magnetic field due to SIMION overpredicting fringe field strength. The difference in spectrometer energy resolution is within ∼10% between the modeled and measured fields. We then assess a simple block model, which is commonly used. We find that the simple block model presented here sufficiently captures the predicted as-built spectrometer performance for any application provided that the user can tolerate uncertainties on absolute energy determination up to 5% and errors on energy resolution up to 1%.