Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
Quantifying Naturalistic Changes in Occupant Postures in Belt-Positioning Booster Seats Utilizing Pressure Mats
Rosalie Connell1,2, Gretchen H Connell1, Julie A Mansfield1
1Injury Biomechanics Research Center, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
Insights
Children in belt-positioning booster seats (BPBs) tend to slouch forward over time, shifting their center of force significantly. High-profile BPBs showed less posture change, potentially reducing injury risks like submarining.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric safety
- Biomechanics
- Human factors engineering
Background:
- Belt-positioning booster seats (BPBs) are crucial for ensuring proper seat belt fit for children.
- Child occupant posture in BPBs significantly impacts their effectiveness and safety.
- BPB design features can influence occupant posture over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively analyze changes in children's postures within belt-positioning booster seats over time.
- To investigate the influence of different BPB configurations on occupant posture using pressure mapping.
- To identify potential correlations between posture changes and injury risks.
Main Methods:
- Thirty children (ages 5-12) participated in 30-minute trials using various backless BPB configurations.
- TekScan 5250 pressure mats recorded center of force (COF) data to track posture shifts.
- Mixed models analyzed COF position changes relative to seating configuration, time, and individual characteristics.
Main Results:
- Children exhibited a statistically significant average forward COF shift of 2.5 cm over 30 minutes.
- No significant differences in average COF position were found across different seating configurations.
- High-profile BPBs demonstrated the least maximum and cumulative forward COF translation, indicating more stable postures.
Conclusions:
- Children's postures naturally change, tending towards slouching, during booster seat use.
- BPB design, specifically profile height, can influence the degree of posture change.
- Significant posture shifts may increase injury risks, such as submarining, highlighting the need for improved BPB designs.
Abstract:
Belt-positioning booster seats (BPBs) help promote proper seat belt fit for children in vehicles. The effectiveness of BPBs depends on occupant posture, which can be influenced by BPB design features. This study aimed to quantitatively describe how children's postures naturally change over time in BPBs, using pressure mats. Thirty children aged 5 to 12 participated in two 30-minute trials using randomly assigned seating configurations. Five configurations were studied by installing two backless BPBs in vehicle captain's chairs, varying booster profile (high, low, or no BPB) and armrest presence (with or without BPB/vehicle seat armrests). TekScan 5250 pressure mats were placed on the seating surfaces. Children began in an ideal reference posture, and center of force (COF) data were collected continuously. Additional observations on posture, behavior, and comfort were periodically collected. Mixed models, including effects of seating configuration, time, and volunteer characteristics, were used to explore changes in COF position from the reference position with time. Children assumed a variety of postures. Over time, children showed a statistically significant forward COF shift of 2.5 cm from the initial posture across all trials (p = 0.003). No significant differences were found in the average COF position or translation between seating configurations in the fore-aft (x) or inboard-outboard (y) directions. However, the maximum and cumulative COF translation in the x-direction was significantly influenced by booster profile, with high-profile configurations resulting in the least amount of translation. Children tended to slouch over time, as evidenced by an average forward COF translation of 2.5 cm over thirty minutes. These findings were supported by video footage and posture data. Trends toward forward COF translation were most apparent in low-profile and no booster configurations. Such changes in booster occupant postures can imply increased injury risk, specifically associated with submarining as evaluated in previous computational investigations. Future research should examine these trends in real-world driving environments and assess how specific BPB design elements may support better long-term posture during vehicle travel.
Related Concept Videos
Anatomical Positions
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...
Normal and Tangetial Components: Problem Solving
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
Pressure Variation in a Fluid at Rest
When measuring pressure at two different levels within the fluid, the difference in pressure...
Logarithmic Differentiation

