Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Tools used to identify nursing students at risk of dropping out: a mixed-methods systematic review
Tuuli Paija1, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa2, Camilla Strandell-Laine3
1Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Faculty of Health and Well-Being, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.
Background:
The global challenge of nursing student dropout is widely studied. However, literature review regarding concrete identification of students at risk of dropping out is lacking.
Aim:
To identify and describe existing tools used in identifying undergraduate bachelor-level nursing students at risk of dropping out and the ability of these tools to identify at-risk students.
Design:
Mixed-methods systematic review.
Data Sources:
Five databases, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (PubMed), ERIC (EBSCOhost), Scopus and Web of Science, were searched in July 2024 and reference lists screened.
Review Methods:
The review was conducted following the JBI mixed-methods systematic review methodology. Studies describing concrete tools to identify individual bachelor-level nursing students at risk of dropping out were included, without temporal limits. Eligible studies were assessed with JBI Critical Appraisal tools. Convergent integrated approach was followed to synthesize data. In total, 12 studies were included.
Results:
Fourteen tools for identifying at-risk nursing students were found, most of them being questionnaires. The tools covered different content areas for dropout-risk identification, ranging from single-area to broad coverage. The tool's ability to identify was examined either as the ability to predict actual or intended dropout, warning signals, or to differentiate at-risk and not-at-risk students, or was not directly measured. Student-registry-based tools seemed to have stronger evidence of their capability compared to questionnaires, yet did not cover a student's personal, emotional or life-situation factors related to dropout, accessible via questionnaires.
Conclusions:
Currently, when no tool seems to be superior to another, educators and administrators exploring possibilities to implement these tools need to consider and possibly compromise between predictive accuracy and thoroughness. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate balance between the objective and subjective factors when developing a valid and reliable tool with the ability to predict either intention or actual dropout of nursing students.
More Related Videos
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Longitudinal Research
Current Trends in Nursing II
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...