Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
An economic analysis of Native CHOICES
Robert Rosenman1, Carolyn Noonan2, Richard F MacLehose3
1School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99163, USA.
Native CHOICES is a cost-effective program that reduces alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs) and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs) in American Indian communities. The intervention demonstrates significant economic benefits and improved quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs) are a significant public health concern linked to alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs).
- The Native CHOICES program, a culturally adapted intervention, effectively reduces AEP risk in American Indian communities.
- This study provides the first economic analysis of the Native CHOICES program.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an economic analysis of the Native CHOICES program.
- To assess the cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from Native CHOICES.
- To evaluate the program's impact on reducing AEPs and FASDs.
Main Methods:
- Utilized pre-pandemic data from a randomized controlled trial of Native CHOICES.
- Conducted economic assessments including cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and QALY analysis.
- Focused on a Northern Plains American Indian community.
Main Results:
- Native CHOICES reduced AEP risk by 18-20% and FASDs by 6.84-7.6% within 6 months post-participation.
- The program yielded a net economic benefit of $308,295 to $376,951 over 6 months.
- Cost efficiency for FASDs avoided ranged from $84,887 to $93,709, with $2330-$2572 per QALY gained.
Conclusions:
- Native CHOICES is a cost-effective intervention for preventing AEPs and FASDs.
- The program demonstrates positive economic returns and improved health outcomes for American Indian participants.
- Culturally adapted public health programs can be both effective and economically viable.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Limits to Natural Selection
Ecological Niches
The Nativist Approach

