Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

1.9K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of one, the...
1.9K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.4K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.4K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes01:23

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes

1.2K
In the absence of an external magnetic field, nuclear spin states are degenerate and randomly oriented. When a magnetic field is applied, the spins begin to precess and orient themselves along (lower energy) or against (higher energy) the direction of the field. At equilibrium, a slight excess population of spins exists in the lower energy state. Because the direction of the magnetic field is fixed as the z-axis,  the precessing magnetic moments are randomly oriented around the z-axis.
1.2K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution01:14

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution

2.3K
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
2.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.4K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.4K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

2.9K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-world radiology data for artificial intelligence-driven cancer support systems and biomarker development.

ESMO real world data and digital oncology·2026
Same author

[Prof. Dr. Gerhard van Kaick on his 90<sup>th</sup> birthday].

Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Image quality of opportunistic breast examinations in photon-counting computed tomography: A phantom study.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2024
Same author

Stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer - Acute toxicity and patient-reported outcomes in the prospective, multicenter <i>SMILE</i> phase II trial.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2024
Same author

Hybrid imaging with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2022
Same author

Influence of diffusion on transverse relaxation rates and phases of an ensemble of magnetic spheres.

Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0
07:41

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Published on: June 5, 2017

10.3K

Simulation of spin dephasing in arbitrary susceptibility fields using physics-informed neural networks.

L T Rotkopf1, J C Holzschuh1, H-P Schlemmer1

  • 1German Cancer Research Center, Department of Radiology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 220, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Physical Review. E
|December 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can now simulate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal dynamics, overcoming limitations of traditional methods for complex Larmor field distributions. This advance offers greater accuracy and flexibility in MRI simulations.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate
11:57

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate

Published on: September 13, 2019

6.9K
Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
09:06

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published on: March 24, 2019

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0
07:41

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Published on: June 5, 2017

10.3K
Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate
11:57

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate

Published on: September 13, 2019

6.9K
Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
09:06

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published on: March 24, 2019

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Computational Physics
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • MRI signal dynamics are complex, influenced by dephasing, diffusion, and susceptibility effects.
  • Analytical solutions for MRI signal dynamics are limited to simple models, necessitating advanced simulation techniques.
  • Accurate simulation of MRI signal dynamics is crucial for improving image acquisition and interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework for predicting MR signal dynamics.
  • To enable simulations for arbitrary local Larmor field distributions.
  • To provide a more flexible and accurate alternative to conventional MRI simulation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented a PINN framework to solve the Bloch-Torrey equation, incorporating diffusion and susceptibility terms.
  • Represented spatiotemporal magnetization as a neural network output, using spatial coordinates and time as inputs.
  • Utilized reflecting boundary conditions and initially isotropic magnetization within the complex Bloch-Torrey operator.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the feasibility of predicting local and total magnetization using the PINN framework for intermediate oscillation frequencies.
  • Identified the need for adapted neural networks (e.g., dual encoders, Fourier features) to learn higher-frequency solutions, as conventional MLPs failed.
  • Observed spectral bias, partially mitigated by Fourier features, and noted the failure of gradient-enhanced PINNs to converge.

Conclusions:

  • Simulating MRI signal dynamics is achievable with a PINN framework, offering high accuracy and enhanced flexibility.
  • PINNs represent a promising advancement for complex MRI simulations where analytical solutions are intractable.
  • Further research into network architectures and training strategies is warranted to fully address challenges like spectral bias.