Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Effectiveness and Safety of 4-Fr Distal Radial Access With Low-Dose Unfractionated Heparin Versus Proximal Radial
Hugo Pilichowski1, Melissa Petrier2, Lionel Mangin1
1Cardiology Department, Hospital Annecy-Genevois, Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.
Background:
A minimum of 2 h is required to achieve hemostasis after coronary angiography via a radial approach.
Objectives:
To evaluate an initial minimalist approach for scheduled coronary angiography, combining 4-Fr distal radial access with low-dose (2000 IU) unfractionated heparin (UFH) (4DRA).
Methods:
This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive outpatients undergoing scheduled diagnostic coronary angiography (November 2023 to November 2024). For distal radial access, a 4 Fr introducer was first used, with intravenous injection of low-dose UFH (2000 IU; 4DRA group). For proximal radial access, a 4-6 Fr introducer was used, with intravenous injection of standard-dose UFH (50 IU/kg; PRA group). The primary outcome was hemostasis time. Secondary safety outcomes were the rate of definite proximal radial artery occlusion (RAO), Grade ≥ II hematomas, examination metrics, puncture failure rate, and technical failure.
Results:
One thousand three hundred eight-two consecutive patients were enrolled (632 4DRA, 750 PRA). Median hemostasis time was lower in 4RDA versus PRA (30 min [interquartile range: 10-111 min] vs. 140 min [120-180 min], respectively; p < 0.001). This time difference was driven by patients who had a diagnostic coronary angiography (20 min [interquartile range: 5-30 min] vs. 135 min [120-160 min]). Proximal RAO was lower in 4DRA (0.2 vs. 1.1%; p = 0.04). Rates of Grade ≥ II hematomas (1.6 vs. 2.3%; p = 0.4) and technical failure (3.2 vs. 3.7%; p = 0.6) were low and were similar between groups.
Conclusion:
An initial 4-Fr distal radial approach combined with low-dose UFH results in a substantial reduction in hemostasis time while also demonstrating an excellent safety profile.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Hemodialysis I: Introduction

