Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Fasting vs Nonfasting, Dose-adjusted Levothyroxine Ingestion in Hypothyroidism: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Jeresa I A Willems1, Daan J L van Twist1, Floris Helmich2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyd Thyroid Center, Zuyderland Medical Center, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Introduction:
Levothyroxine (LT4) is recommended for intake in a fasting state to optimize absorption. However, fasting intake is often burdensome and may reduce adherence. In a previous questionnaire study, we observed a strong patient preference for taking LT4 with breakfast. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether nonfasting LT4 intake-accompanied by a 15% dose increase-could maintain TSH stability compared to fasting LT4 intake.
Methods:
Adults with well-controlled hypothyroidism were randomized to fasting or dose-adjusted, breakfast LT4 intake. TSH, free T4, and total T3 were measured every 6 weeks, followed by LT4 dose adjustment if needed. The primary outcome was TSH stability, defined as 2 consecutive values within the reference range and a maximum ±1 mIU/L change from baseline. Patients were followed until TSH stability was reached, with a maximum of 24 weeks. After the initial study period, patients in the fasting group were invited to cross over to nonfasting intake, with similar follow-up.
Results:
Eighty-eight patients (80.7% female, median age 62y [interquartile range: 49-69]) were randomized to fasting (n = 43) or breakfast intake (n = 45). TSH stability was comparable between groups: 74.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 61.0-88.0%] in the fasting vs 73.3% (95%CI: 60.0-87.0%) in the breakfast group (P = not significant). Similar findings were observed in the crossover group. The breakfast group reported greater improvement in self-reported well-being (33.3% vs 16.3%, P = .07) and a stronger preference for nonfasting intake (76.2% vs 44.2%, P < .001). By the end of the study, 88.9% chose to continue nonfasting intake.
Conclusion:
LT4 ingestion with breakfast with a 15% dose increase maintained TSH stability and improved patient well-being. Given the strong patient preference, this patient-centered approach may offer a viable alternative to fasting administration.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Synthesis and Regulation of Thyroid Hormones
Upon reaching the thyroid gland, TSH stimulates the follicular cells' active uptake of iodide ions from the blood. The ions diffuse to the apical surface of the cells and are oxidized to iodine. The...
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients

