Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
Published on: January 19, 2024
Liposomal Iron vs. Conventional Iron in the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Children: A Randomized Controlled
Suresh Rangaraj1, Preethi Suresh1, Subash Sundar1
1Department of Pediatrics, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu, IND.
Insights
Ferrous ascorbate improved hemoglobin levels more effectively than liposomal iron in children with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). However, liposomal iron demonstrated better oral tolerance and adherence, despite lower efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Hematology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Gastrointestinal side effects of conventional ferrous iron impact treatment adherence for iron deficiency anemia (IDA).
- Liposomal iron offers improved bioavailability and tolerability, addressing limitations of standard iron supplementation.
- A comparative study is needed to evaluate liposomal iron against ferrous ascorbate in pediatric IDA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and tolerability of liposomal iron versus ferrous ascorbate in treating IDA in children aged 6-60 months.
- To assess improvements in hemoglobin levels and iron indices between the two treatment groups.
- To evaluate oral tolerance, adherence, and incidence of constipation with each iron formulation.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving 98 children (6-60 months) with confirmed IDA.
- Group A received liposomal iron (1 mg/kg/day); Group B received ferrous ascorbate (3 mg/kg/day) for one month.
- Hemoglobin levels, iron indices, oral tolerance, adherence, and constipation were assessed.
Main Results:
- Ferrous ascorbate significantly increased hemoglobin levels compared to liposomal iron (p=0.0018).
- Liposomal iron showed better oral tolerance (p=0.042), adherence (p=0.047), and less constipation (p=0.046).
- Baseline characteristics and hemoglobin levels were similar in both groups before treatment.
Conclusions:
- Ferrous ascorbate was more effective in raising hemoglobin levels in pediatric IDA despite tolerability issues.
- Liposomal iron offered superior tolerability and adherence but was less effective in improving hemoglobin.
- The choice of iron formulation for IDA in children requires balancing efficacy with patient tolerance and adherence.
Introduction:
Despite their established efficacy, gastrointestinal adverse effects of ferrous iron lead to reduced acceptability, poor adherence to treatment, and the persistence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Liposomal iron is characterized by high bioavailability, reduced side effects, and improved compliance, making it appropriate for patients requiring iron supplementation. Hence, there is a need to compare conventional iron (ferrous ascorbate) with liposomal iron employed for the treatment of IDA in children.
Aims And Objectives:
The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of liposomal iron with conventional elemental iron (ferrous ascorbate) in improving hemoglobin levels and iron indices among children aged 6-60 months with IDA.
Methodology:
The study was conducted between June and September 2024 at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre in Tamil Nadu, India. Children aged 6-60 months with confirmed IDA, not receiving any iron supplementation for three months prior to study inclusion, and with no other hematological disorders or active infections were included. A total of 98 children were included and allocated into two groups of 49 each. Group A was treated with liposomal iron (1 mg/kg/day), and Group B with ferrous ascorbate (3 mg/kg/day) for one month. The response to treatment in both groups was assessed. Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test and the t-test.
Results:
Baseline characteristics were similar. The mean base hemoglobin in Group A was 8.4 g/dL, and that in Group B was 8.3 g/dL. After one month of iron supplementation, the mean hemoglobin only rose to 8.5 g/dL in Group A but to 9.3 g/dL in Group B. The difference in the rise of hemoglobin between Group A and Group B was significant (p=0.0018). Liposomal iron had adequate oral tolerance (p=0.042), better adherence (p=0.047), and a lesser incidence of constipation (p=0.046).
Conclusion:
Despite poor oral tolerability, poor adherence, and a higher incidence of constipation, ferrous ascorbate was found to be superior compared to liposomal iron in treating children with IDA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

