Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026
Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models
Published on: September 27, 2024
Surgical versus conservative treatment of odontoid fractures in the elderly: A randomized controlled clinical study
Arthur Wagner1, Carolin Albrecht1, Sophie Dittmer2
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Background:
Odontoid fractures of the second cervical vertebra commonly affect elderly patients due to osteoporosis and low-energy trauma. Treatment is controversial, with prolonged cervical collar immobilization risking non-union and complications, and surgical C1-C2 stabilization involving higher upfront surgical risks. High-level evidence from randomized controlled trials to guide optimal treatment decisions is lacking. The SCORE study aims to determine whether surgical stabilization is non-inferior to conservative collar management in maintaining functional independence for elderly patients with unstable odontoid fractures.
Methods:
SCORE is a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial enrolling 322 patients aged ≥70 years with acute (≤2 weeks) unstable odontoid Type II, III, or atypical fractures. Participants will be randomized 1:1, stratified by center, to receive surgical stabilization via posterior C1-C2 fixation or conservative management with a rigid cervical collar. The primary outcome measure is the change in Barthel Index (BI) from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include quality of life (EQ-5D), neck pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), neck disability (Neck Disability Index, NDI), radiographic fusion, treatment compliance, cross-over rates to surgery, and incidence of adverse and serious adverse events up to 6 months. Follow-ups will take place at 12 weeks and 6 months post-injury, with an additional visit at approximately 2 weeks post-surgery for surgical patients. Analysis will use mixed models for repeated measures, targeting 90% power to detect non-inferiority within a 5-point margin on the BI (one-sided α = 0.025), accounting for 15% attrition.
Discussion:
This trial addresses a critical evidence gap by directly comparing surgical and conservative treatments, aiming to guide clinical decision-making and improve functional outcomes and quality of life in elderly patients.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06961578.
