Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
Performance of 99mTc-Sestamibi Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography for Characterizing
Steven P Rowe1, Salikh Murtazaliev2, Alireza Amindarolzarbi3
1Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Purpose:
Anatomic imaging and biopsy have limitations in the risk stratification of indeterminate renal masses. Molecular imaging offers opportunities to improve noninvasive risk stratification. 99mTc-sestamibi is a mitochondrial imaging agent that has shown increased uptake in benign/indolent renal tumors and a lack of uptake in aggressive renal cell carcinomas (RCCs).
Materials And Methods:
We evaluated the accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission CT (SPECT/CT) imaging to characterize histologically diagnosed renal masses using 2 cohorts of patients; one from a prospective scan-and-resect clinical trial and a second from routine clinical care. The rate of renal mass positivity (ie, "hot tumors") on 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT was stratified by histology. Diagnostic performance to identify histologic groupings of interest was measured by sensitivity and specificity.
Results:
Three hundred forty-four patients with 361 tumors (124 trial, 237 clinical) were included. Most clear cell RCC (97%) and papillary or clear cell papillary RCC (80%-84%) were cold while chromophobe RCCs were equally likely to be hot or cold (52% vs 48%). Surgically resected oncocytomas tended to be hot (69%), with even higher positivity for biopsy with oncocytic neoplasms in the clinical cohort (87%). Limitations included the heterogeneous nature of the cohort and the use of biopsy for histologic diagnosis in the clinical cohort.
Conclusions:
99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT is a novel method to effectively risk-stratify indeterminate renal masses. As with any nonsurgical method for renal mass characterization, there are potential false positives and false negatives, and those should be weighed carefully in shared decision-making with the patient to guide further evaluation and management.
More Related Videos
06:54MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging